Mr. Wilton is the
victim of a hostile
Wiki obituary. Before that he was the Russian correspondent
of The Times for several years and reported on the
Bolshevik Revolution, which
followed the
Russian
Revolution or February Revolution
of 1917. The interesting aspect is that he was
well thought of by the editor until his reports revealed that the second
revolution, the October Revolution was in fact a
Bolshevik coup d'état being carried out by largely by Jews
- see
Jews Running The
Bolshevik Party. Then
it was all down hill.
He gives us the their names and nationalities in his book,
The Last Days of the Romanovs.
It is reviewed by the
Institute for Historical Review at
The Last Days of the Romanovs (Review)
He tells us in Jews Ran The
Bolshevik Party that:- "The Extraordinary Commission [Cheka or Vecheka] of Moscow was composed of
36 members, including one German, one Pole, one Armenian, two Russians, eight
Latvians, and 23 Jews. "The Council of the People's Commissars [the Soviet .government] numbered
two Armenians, three Russians, and 17 Jews. "According to data furnished by the Soviet press, out of 556 important
functionaries of the Bolshevik state, including the above-mentioned, in
1918-1919 there were: 17 Russians, two Ukrainians, eleven Armenians, 35 Letts
[Latvians], 15 Germans, one Hungarian, ten Georgians, three Poles, three Finns,
one Czech, one Karaim, and 457 Jews." This means that 82% were Jews while
3% were Russian - see
#Robert Wilton below.
The identity of their original source has be From
The Fate of the Romanovs
Quote from: Winston Churchill This is the last candid
statement (discoverable by me) from a leading public man on this
question. After it the ban on public discussion came down and the
great silence ensued, which continues to this day. In 1953 Mr.
Churchill refused permission (requisite under English law) for a
photostat to be made of this article (Illustrated Sunday Herald,
February 8, 1920), without saying why. Quote The United States Ambassador, Mr.
David R. Francis, reported similarly: Quote M. Oudendyke's report was
deleted from later editions of the British official publication and
all such authentic documents of that period are now difficult to
obtain. Fortunately for the student,
one witness preserved the official record. Now, the question is: is there a copy
of Wilton's book that has not been censored available anywhere? [ See
Last Days of the Romanovs
- Editor ]
Robert Wilton
ex Wiki Wilton, who was born in
Cringleford,
Norfolk,
was the son of a British mining engineer employed in Russia. In 1889 he
joined the European staff of the
New York Herald, remaining with that newspaper for fourteen years, and
corresponding on both Russian and German affairs. He then took up an
appointment as
The
Times correspondent in
St Petersburg, and became known as a keen observer of events in Russia
during the last years of the
Tsarist regime. After the
Revolution, he moved to
Siberia.
Following the collapse of the
Kolchak government, Wilton managed to escape from Russia and
eventually arrived in
Paris
where, in 1920, he rejoined the New York Herald. In 1924 he joined the
staff of a newly-founded newspaper, the Paris Times (which published in
English). He died from cancer at the Hertford British Hospital in Paris
early in 1925. Wilton served with the Russian army during the First World War, and was
awarded the
Cross of St George. He was the author of two books: Russia's Agony (published by
Edward Arnold, London, 1918) and
The Last Days of the Romanovs (1920).
Spartacus
Educational - a hostile left wing site.
Russia's Agony by Robert Wilton.
The Last Days of the Romanovs
by Robert Wilton, George Gustav
Telberg and Nikolai Sokolov. Robert
Wilton
told us that "According to data furnished by the Soviet press, out of 556 important
functionaries of the Bolshevik state, including the above-mentioned, in
1918-1919 there were: 17 Russians, two Ukrainians, eleven Armenians, 35 Letts
[Latvians], 15 Germans, one Hungarian, ten Georgians, three Poles, three Finns,
one Czech, one Karaim, and 457 Jews."
From
The Fate of the Romanovs
Jews May Have Killed Russia's Last Czar Nicholas II In Ritual Murder, Investigators Claim
[ By
"A large share of the church commission members have no doubts that the
murder was ritual,” Father Tikhon Shevkunov, the Orthodox bishop heading the
panel,
told The Associated Press. Historical consensus says the czar was killed by Bolsheviks, but the
conspiracy theory that he was actually killed by Jews has been promoted for
years among far-right, anti-Semitic groups that often conflate Jews with
communists. Conspiracy theories blaming Jews for the communist revolution
were also popular among post-revolution Russian emigres and Russian Orthodox
Church members abroad.
In reality, some important Bolshevik leaders were Jews [ Make that
82%, a convincing majority in fact - Editor ], but
the majority of Russia's Jewish population did not support the
Bolsheviks. [ See
#Why
Did Russian Jews Support the Bolshevik Revolution for the lie
direct - Editor ] Jews in Russia expressed concern that these anti-Semitic myths are now
being peddled by religious leaders, and experts say the investigation shows
anti-Semitism remains a persistent problem in Russia. “There is a big old tradition of anti-Semitism in Russia, a forgery in
the Czarist period outlining a fictitious [ sic ] Jewish plan for world
domination. [ See The
Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion - Ed. ] So the attempt to identify the Bolsheviks as Jewish started
quite early, during the Civil War after the [1917] Revolution, but didn't
have any real basis,” Gerard Livingstone, a history and philosophy professor
at the Open University in the United Kingdom, told Newsweek. [
He lies - Ed. ] “Anti-Semitism persisted in the Communist era. And of course the
characterization of the Bolsheviks as Jews was taken up by the Nazis, and
after them by the Far Right ever since," he said. Bishop ikhon, an influential religious figure with close ties to Russian
President Vladimir Putin, has specifically singled out
Yakov Yurovsky, a Bolshevik organizer of the czar's execution who
happened to be Jewish [ See
#The executioner Yurovsky's account - Blog & Alexander Palace
Time Machine ], to support his theories of a ritual killing. Tikhon
claims Yurovsky took special pleasure in the killings as an act of revenge.
Yakov Sverdlov, another Bolshevik involved in the killing of the last
czar, was also Jewish [ See
#Yakov
Sverdlov – Russiapedia Leaders Prominent Russians ], conspiracy theorists point out. Previously, the young
pro-Putin parliamentarian
Natalia
Poklonskaya [ A forthright lass - Ed. ] also claimed the Czar's
execution had “evil” religious motives.
https://non.to/jluFqS -
Jews May Have Killed Russia's Last Czar Nicholas II In Ritual Murder,
Investigators Claim Strange that one can’t find the list of the shooters like Isidor Edelstein,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yakov_Yurovsky - jew He was best
known as the chief executioner of
Emperor
Nicholas II of Russia,
his family, and four retainers on the morning of July 17, 1918.
Why Did Russian Jews Support the Bolshevik Revolution – Tablet Magazine It is difficult to paint a precise picture of the political views of
Russian Jews at the time of the Revolution for the simple reason that we
have relatively little precise information on the subject: From 1905 to 1917
the Jews voted in elections for the four parliaments (called Dumas) that
were created in response to the 1905 Revolution. None of these elections
were based on universal suffrage, first and foremost because women could not
vote, and so we have no firm data whatsoever on the views of half of the
Jewish population. Moreover, the franchise was more and more restricted as
the years went by, and so the number of Jews voting for and being elected to
the Duma went down, rather than up, during the 12 years of the parliaments’
existence. Twice in 1917, the Jews voted again, this time with female
suffrage, but we still lack data on a very significant chunk of the Jewish
population. From the voting data we do have it is possible to conclude several
crucial points: First, the Bolsheviks had very little support among the
Jewish population, possibly the lowest amount of any of the multiple parties
vying for support “on the Jewish street.” And this was despite the fact that
many of the Bolsheviks’ most important leaders were Jews—though Jews who
viewed their Jewishness as an incidental artifact of their birth, with no
meaning for them either religiously (as they were atheists) or nationally
(as they regarded themselves as internationalists). Most famously, when Leon
Trotsky was asked what his nationality was, he replied “socialist.” More
Jews, though hardly a great number, supported the Mensheviks, the less
radically Marxist half of the Russian Social Democratic Party, headed by a
Jew, Julius Martov, who opposed Lenin’s stance on violent revolution but
shared the Bolsheviks’ anti-nationalist stance. Far more Jews, though
still a relatively small percentage of the population, supported the
Bund—the Jewish socialist party whose stance on socialism was all but
identical to the Mensheviks, but slowly adopted an idiosyncratic form of
Jewish nationalism based on national cultural autonomy for the Jews of the
Empire and dedication to Yiddish as the national language of the Jewish
people. Thus, in toto, the Jewish population broadly rejected socialism
in any guise, Jewish or not, as the solution to the problems of the Jews in
Russia. Far more Jews, though still a minority, supported the liberal party known
as the Kadets (the acronym for the Constitutional Democrats), who were
dedicated to liberal constitutionalism, universal suffrage, and equal rights
for the minorities of the Empire. In its early years, the party included
several prominent Jewish intellectuals and lawyers in its leadership ranks,
a matter which attracted a great deal of support from the Jewish population
as a whole. But in the years before the Revolution the Kadets became more
and more conservative, often siding with the Octobrists, a right-wing party
that supported the monarchy, and therefore lost a good deal of its appeal
among Jews. A small specifically Jewish liberal party—the Folkspartei—shared
the Kadets’ liberalism, to which they added support for national cultural
autonomy similar to that of the Bund. They appealed to a very small sliver
of the Jewish community—basically academics and other intellectuals. Far more complicated to assess is the degree of support for Zionism at
that time in the Russian Jewish community. To be sure, when Theodor Herzl
founded the Zionist movement in Basel, Switzerland, in 1897, the majority of
his followers were from the Russian Empire, and the movement as a whole
gained a large amount of support in Russia in the subsequent two decades.
But what exactly it meant to belong to a Zionist party is far from clear:
Many Jews bought the symbolic shekel which gained them a membership card,
but that did not mean much in terms of their actual worldviews. And almost
from the start, Russian Zionism split into a number of opposing factions:
the “political Zionists,” who supported Herzl and his goal of creating a
Jewish homeland in Palestine; “cultural” or “spiritual” Zionists,
led by Ahad Ha’am, who opposed mass Jewish migration to Palestine and
the immediate creation of a state in favor of a cultural revolution among
the Jews based on a radically secular new Hebraic culture; various socialist
Zionist parties which attempted to synthesize conflicting views of
social-democracy and Marxism with Zionism. And finally there was the tiny
Mizrachi, the Orthodox Zionist party founded in Vilnius in 1902, attempting
against all odds to combine fealty to Orthodox Judaism alongside Zionism—an
almost impossible task at the time, since the vast majority of Russia’s
rabbis vehemently denounced Zionism as a heretical movement led by sinners
and degenerates who would bring the Jewish people to doom. Indeed, there was
an even tinier movement of what would later be called “ultra-Orthodox”
Judaism, which advocated working within the political system—any political
system!—to guarantee the religious rights of the Orthodox Jewish population;
in 1916 the international ultra-Orthodox movement “Agudat Yisrael” was
founded in Germany but was essentially led by both Hasidic and non-Hasidic
rabbinical figures from the Russian Empire. Of all these groupings, the only one pledged to the unilateral support of
the czarist monarchy was the ultra-Orthodox, who for the last decade of
tsarism made common cause with the autocracy to combat the spread of
socialism and Zionism among the Jewish population. At the other end of the
political spectrum, only the Bolsheviks were pledged to a violent revolution
to topple the tsars. The vast majority of the Jewish community fell
somewhere between these two stools, neither admiring Nicholas II and his
highly controversial wife Alexandra nor wishing for their immediate demise.
As the Yiddish proverb has it, “Never pray for a new king”—the Jews had
learned from their history that the greatest danger to them was political
chaos and instability. To be sure, the years before the Revolution witnessed an enormous amount
of both insecurity and chaos: several waves of pogroms broke out in
1881-1882, 1903, and 1905; and World War I, fought on the territory in which
the majority of the world’s Jews lived, caused enormous suffering and
dislocation, including a massive flight of refugees both across the border
to the Austrian Empire and back into the interior of Russia itself. So large
was this population flight that the czarist government actually abolished
the Pale of Settlement in 1916 because there were hundreds of thousands of
Jews living in places in which they were officially forbidden./p>
But on the other side of the coin, hundreds of thousands of Jews fought
in the Russian Army in WWI—estimates range as high as 600,000—and it would
be reckless to assume that they were not, on some level, loyal to the regime
for which they fought and died. Indeed, all the political movements just
mentioned save the Bolsheviks, supported the war effort—even the Zionists,
who in theory ought to have opposed support of the Russian state as an
expression of the chimerical goals of Jewish emancipation and integration. And so when the February Revolution erupted in early 1917 and Nicholas II
unexpectedly abdicated the throne and Russia was declared a republic, run by
a provisional government, the Jews—like the rest of the population—were
shocked, as no one (not even Lenin) had predicted this result. But almost
immediately, the new government proceeded to rule the vast former empire in
a way congenial to the Jewish population. Most importantly, one of the first
acts of the provisional government was to abolish all legal restrictions
based on religion, race, or nationality: In one stroke, the 5-and-a-half
million Russian Jews were emancipated, free and equal citizens of the realm.
Soon, all restrictions on the freedom of speech, of the press, of assembly,
of religion, disappeared, and the Jews (like everyone else in the new state)
reveled in these new rights, issuing a plethora of new publications,
artistic creations, newspapers, political platforms from left to right.
Admittedly the new government was shaky and divided, but its leaders
represented precisely those elements of the pre-Revolutionary world—the
moderate left and center—that the Jews found to their liking. And there is
no evidence to suggest that they changed their minds—including still
supporting the War effort—in the fall of 1917, when the provisional
government began to fall apart, more and more replaced by the Petrograd
Soviet, made up of workers, soldiers, and professional revolutionaries—the
latter, once more, including a good number of Jews who rejected their own
Jewishness. And so, as the October 1917 seizure of power by the Bolsheviks turned
into the Russian Revolution, almost all Russian Jews did not support the new
regime. Soon, elections were called for a Congress of Russian Jews and then
for a Constituent Assembly promised by the Bolsheviks; in both these votes,
the Jews stuck to their pattern in the earlier elections, supporting
coalitions of Jewish parties representing the broad center of the political
spectrum; the Bolsheviks still garnered only a small percentage of the
Jewish vote. So what happened? In the simplest terms, as the civil war broke out, the
anti-Bolshevik forces soon became more and more dominated by the right wing
and its blatantly and violently anti-Semitic supporters. Although early on
there were some pogroms waged by Red Army troops, these were quickly and
firmly condemned by the Bolshevik leaders (again, especially Trotsky, who
was, after all, the head of the Red Army). In sharpest contrast, the White
Army soldiers conducted massive pogroms against the Jews. And the clash was
not only between the Reds and the Whites but soon also between the Red Army
and the various Ukrainian and Polish forces, who also carried out an
enormous number of pogroms against the Jewish population. Often, it was difficult to tell which side was worse: In his remarkable
short story Gedali, Isaac Babel portrays an old but noble
shopkeeper in the destroyed city of Zhitomir, remarking to the narrator that
he can’t tell the difference between the various armies occupying and
destroying his town: “The Pole shoots, because he is the counter-revolution.
And you shoot because you are the Revolution. But Revolution is happiness.
And happiness does not like orphans in its house. A good man does good
deeds. The Revolution is the good deed done by good men. But good men do not
kill. Hence the Revolution is done by bad men. But the Poles are also bad
men. Who is going to tell Gedali which is the Revolution and which the
counterrevolution?” But Isaac Babel had, in fact, made his choice, falling in line with the
new Soviet authorities, as did scores of other Jewish writers, painters,
sculptors, novelists, short-story writers, who saw in the Revolution vast
opportunities for creative liberation. And the vast Jewish masses, whether
previously supporters of the Zionists or the Bund, the Agudah or the Kadets,
had no hesitation in making a simple, life-defining decision: the White Army
and its allies attacked, murdered, and destroyed Jewish lives and homes; the
Red Army attacked the pogromshchiki, made anti-Semitism a crime
against the state, outlawed pogroms, and even prosecuted anti-Semitism in
its ranks. True, the economic system the new regime introduced—“War
Communism”—destroyed the very basis of Jewish life in Eastern Europe for
centuries—the market economy—as well as the free liberal professions that
Jews had entered into en masse in recent decades. Gedali’s little shop “as
if out of a page of Dickens,” could not be restored. But as the author of
Deuteronomy had counseled the Israelites long before: “I have set before you
life and death, blessings and curses. Now choose life, so that you and your
children may live.” And choosing life meant siding with the Bolsheviks. Certainly, there were many Jews who, in their heart of hearts, still
maintained their fealty to their old political parties, their old way of
life, their Zionism, their Bundism, their liberalism, their religious
Orthodoxy. Many would fight as best they could for these causes in the next
two decades, largely underground. But as the new Soviet Union rose from the
ashes of the Revolution, the Civil War, the Soviet-Ukrainian War, the
Soviet-Polish War, and more, the Jews made their peace, or more, with the
new Communist state which committed itself against the forces of reaction
and anti-Semitism. Their subsequent fate under Soviet socialism—and its
ultimate descent into the lunacy of the Stalinist terror—was not foreseen.
Q
http://www.alexanderpalace.org/palace/yurovmurder.html
The executioner Yurovsky's account - Blog & Alexander Palace Time Machine On the 16th in the morning I dispatched the little cook, the boy
Sednev, under the pretext that there would be a meeting with his
uncle who had come to Sverdlovsk. It caused anxiety among the
prisoners. Botkin, the usual intermediary, and then one of the
daughters asked about Sednev - where, why and for how long he had
been taken away - because Alexei missed him. Having received an
explanation, they went away apparently calmed down. I prepared 12
revolvers and designated who would shoot whom. Comrade Filipp [Goloshchyokin]
told me that a truck would arrive at midnight; the people coming
would say a password; we would let them pass and hand over the
corpses to them to carry away and bury. At about 11 o'clock at night
on July 16 I assembled the men again, handed out the revolvers and
announced that soon we had to begin liquidating the prisoners. I
told Pavel Medvedev he had to check the guard outside and inside
thoroughly. He and the guard commander had to keep constant watch
over the area around the house and in the house where the external
guard was stationed and to maintain communications with me. I also
told him that at the last moment, when everything was ready for the
execution, he had tell the guards and the others in the detachment
not to worry about any shots they might hear from the house, and not
to leave the premises. If there were any unusual amount of unrest,
he was to notify me through the established line of communication. The truck did not arrive until half past one. The extra wait
caused some anxiety - waiting in general, and the short night
especially. Only when the truck had arrived (or after telephone
calls that it was on the way) did I go to wake the prisoners. Botkin
slept in the room nearest to the entrance. He came out and asked me
what the matter was. I told him to wake everybody, because there was
unrest in the town and it was dangerous for them to remain on the
top floor. I said I would move them to another place. Gathering
everybody consumed a lot of time, about 40 minutes. When the family
had dressed, I led them to the room in the basement that had been
designated earlier. It must be said here that when Comrade Nikulin
and I thought up our plan, we did not consider beforehand that, one,
the windows would let out noise; two, the victims would be standing
next to a brick wall; and finally, three (It was impossible to
foresee this), the firing would occur in an uncoordinated way. That
should not have happened. Each man had one person to shoot and so
everything should have been all right. The causes of the
disorganized firing became clear later. Although I told [the
victims] through Botkin that they did not have to take anything with
them they collected various small things - pillows, bags and so on
and, it seems to me, a small dog. Having gone down to the room (At the entrance to the room, on the
right there was a very wide window), I ordered them to stand along
the wall. Obviously, at that moment they did not imagine what
awaited them. Alexandra Feodrovna said "There are not even chairs
here." Nicholas was carrying Alexei. He stood in the room with him
in his arms. Then I ordered a couple of chairs. On one of them, to
the right of the entrance, almost in the corner, Alexandra Feodrovna
sat down. The daughters and Demidova stood next to her, to the left
of the entrance. Beside them Alexei was seated in the armchair.
Behind him Dr. Botkin, the cook and the others stood. Nicholas stood
opposite Alexei. At the same time I ordered the men to go down and
to be ready in their places when the command was given. Nicholas had
put Alexei on the chair and stood in such a way, that he shielded
him. Alexei sat in the left corner from the entrance, and so far as
I can remember, I said to Nicholas approximately this: His royal and
close relatives inside the country and abroad were trying to save
him, but the Soviet of Workers' Deputies resolved to shoot them. He
asked "What?" and turned toward Alexei. At that moment I shot him
and killed him outright. He did not get time to face us to get an
answer. At that moment disorganized, not orderly firing began. The
room was small, but everybody could come in and carry out the
shooting according to the set order. But many shot through the
doorway. Bullets began to ricochet because the wall was brick.
Moreover, the firing intensified when the victims shouts arose. I
managed to stop the firing but with great difficulty. A bullet, fired by somebody in the back, hummed near my head and
grazed either the palm or finger (I do not remember) of somebody.
When the firing stopped, it turned out that the daughters, Alexandra
Feodrovna and, it seems, Demidova and Alexei too, were alive. I
think they had fallen from fear or maybe intentionally, and so they
were alive. Then we proceeded to finish the shooting. (Previously I
had suggested shooting at the heart to avoid a lot of blood). Alexei
remained sitting petrified. I killed him. They shot the daughters
but did not kill them. Then Yermakov resorted to a bayonet, but that
did not work either. Finally they killed them by shooting them in
the head. Only in the forest did I finally discover the reason why
it had been so hard to kill the daughters and Alexandra Feodrovna. After the shooting it was necessary to carry away the corpses,
but it was a comparatively long way. How could we do it? Somebody
came up with an idea: stretchers. (We did not think about it
earlier.) We took shafts from the sledges and, it seems, put sheets
on them. Having confirmed they were dead, we began to carry them
out. It was discovered that traces of blood would be everywhere. I
said to get some smooth woolen military cloth immediately and put
some of it onto the stretchers and then line the truck with it. I
directed Mikhail Medvedev to take the corpses. He was a Cheka man
then and currently works in the GPU. He and Pyotr Zakharovich
Yermakov had to take the bodies and take them away. When they had
removed the first corpse somebody said (I do not remember exactly
who it was) that someone had taken some valuables. Then I understood
that evidently there had been valuables in the things that they had
brought with them. I stopped the removal immediately, assembled the
men and demanded the valuables be returned. After some denial, two
men returned the valuables they had taken. After I threatened the looters with shooting, I removed those two
and ordered Comrade Nikulin (as far as I remember) to escort the
bodies, having warned him about valuables. I first collected
everything - the things they had taken and other things as well -
and I sent all of it to the commandant's office. Comrade Filipp [Goloshchyokin], apparently sparing me (My health
was not very good), told me not to go to the "funeral" but I worried
very much about disposing of the corpses properly. So I decided to
go personally, and it turned out I did the right thing. Otherwise,
all the corpses would wind up in the hands of the White Guards. It
is easy to imagine how they would have exploited the situation. After instructions were given to wash and clean everything, at
about three o'clock or even a little later, we left. I took several
men from the internal guards. I did not know where the corpses were
supposed to be buried, as I have said. Filipp Goloshchyokin had
assigned that to Comrade Yermakov (By the way it seems it was Pavel
Vedvedev who told me that night that he had seen Comrade Filipp,
when he was running to the team. Comrade Filipp was walking back and
forth all the time near the house, apparently because he was anxious
about how everything would turn out). Yermakov drove us somewhere at
the Verkh-Isetsky Works. I was never at that place and did not know
it. At about two-three versts (or maybe more) from the Verkh-Isetsky
Works, a whole escort of people on horseback or in carriages met us.
I asked Yermakov who these people were, why they were there. He
answered that he had assembled those people. I still do not know why
there were so many. I heard only shouts "We thought they would come
here alive, but it turns out they are dead." Also, it seems about
three-four versts farther our truck got stuck between two trees.
There where we stopped several of Yermakov's people were stretching
out girls' blouses. We discovered again that there were valuables
and they were taking them. I ordered that men be posted to keep
anyone from coming near the truck. The truck was stuck and could not move. I asked Yermakov, "Is it
still far to the chosen place?" He said "Not far, beyond railroad
beds." And there behind the trees was a marsh. Bogs were everywhere.
I wondered "Why had he herded in so many people and horses. If only
there had been carts instead of carriages." But there was nothing we
could do. We had to unload to lighten the truck, but that did not
help. Then I ordered them to load the carriages, because it was
already light and we did not have time to wait any longer. Only at
daybreak did we come to the famous "gully". Several steps from the
mine where the burial had been planned, peasants were sitting around
the fire, apparently having spent the night at the hayfield. On the
way me met several people. It became impossible to carry on our work
in sight of them. It must be said, the situation had become
difficult. Everything might come to nothing. At that moment I still
did not know that the mine would not meet our needs at all. And
those damned valuables! Just then I did not know that there was so
much of them or that the people Yermakov had recruited were
unsuitable for the project. Yes, it was too much! I had to disperse
the people. I found out we had gone about 15-16 versts from the city
and had driven to the village of Koptyaki, two or three versts from
there. We had to cordon the place off at some distance, and we did
it. Besides that, I sent an order to the village to keep everybody
out, explaining that the Czech Legion was not far away, that our
units had assembled here and that it was dangerous to be here. I
ordered the men to turn back anybody to the village and to shoot any
stubborn, disobedient persons if that did not work. Another group of
men was sent to the town because they were not needed. Having done
all of this, I ordered [the men] to load the corpses and to take off
the clothes for burning, that is, to destroy absolutely everything
they had, to remove any additional incriminating evidence if the
corpses were somehow discovered. I ordered bonfires. When we began
to undress the bodies, we discovered something on the daughters and
on Alexandra Feodrovna. I do not remember exactly what she had on,
the same as on the daughters or simply things that had been sewed
on. But the daughters had on bodices almost entirely of diamonds and
[other] precious stones. Those were not only places for valuables
but protective armor at the same time. That is why neither bullets
nor bayonets got results. By the way, only they had guilt in their
dying agony. The valuables turned out to be about one-half pud.
Greed was so great that on Alexandra Feodrovna, by the way, there
was simply an enormous piece of round gold wire, turned out as a
sheer bracelet and weighing about one pound. All the valuables were
ripped out immediately, so that it would not be necessary to carry
the bloody rags around with us. Valuables discovered by the White
Guards were undoubtedly related to those sewed into other things.
After burning, they remained in the ashes. Several diamonds were
handed over to me the next day by Comrades who had found them there.
How did they overlook the other valuables? They had enough time for
it. Most likely they simply did not figure it out. By the way, one
has to suppose that some valuables will be returned to us through
Torgsin ["Trade with foreigners" stores], because they were probably
picked up by the peasants of the Koptyaki village after our
departure. The valuables had been collected, the things had been
burned and the completely naked corpses had been thrown into the
mine. From that very moment new problems began. The water just
barely covered the bodies. What should we do? We had the idea of
blowing up the mines with bombs to cover them, but nothing came of
it. I saw that the funeral had achieved nothing and that it was
impossible to leave things that way. It was necessary to begin all
over again. But what should we do? Where should we put the corpses?
About at 2 p.m. I decided to go to the town, because it was clear
that we had to extract the corpses from the mine and to carry them
to another place. Even the blind could discover them. Besides, the
place was exposed. People had seen something was going on there. I
set up posts, guards in place, and took the valuables and left. I
went to the regional executive committee and reported to the
authorities how bad things were. Comrade Safarov and somebody else
(I do not remember who) listened but said nothing. Then I found
Filipp [Goloshchyokin] and explained to him we had to transfer the
corpses to another place. When he agreed I proposed to send people
to raise the corpses. At the same time I ordered him to take bread
and food because the men were hungry and exhausted, not having slept
for about 24 hours. They had to wait for me there. It turned out to
be difficult to get to the corpses and lift them out. The men got
very exhausted doing it. Apparently they were at it all night
because they went there late. I went to the town executive committee, to Sergei Yergerovich
Chutskayev who was its chairman at the time to ask for advice. Maybe
he knew of a place. He proposed a very deep abandoned mine on the
Moscow high road. I got a car, took someone from the regional Cheka
with me, Polushin, it seems, and someone else and we left. But one
and a half versts away from the appointed place the car broke down.
The driver was left to repair it, and we went on foot. We looked
over the place and decided it was good. The only problem was to
avoid onlookers. Some people lived near the place and we decided to
come and take them away to the town and after the project let them
come back. That was our decision. We came back to the car but it had
to be towed. I decided to wait for a passing car. A while later some
people rode up on two horses. I stopped them. The fellows seemed to
know me. They were hurrying to the plant. With great reluctance they
gave us the horses. While we rode another plan took shape: burn the corpses. But
nobody knew how to do it. Polushin seems to have said they already
knew that because nobody really knew how it would come out. I was
still considering the mines on the Moscow high road and then
transportation. I decided to get carts. The plan came to me at the
thought of failure in burying them in groups in different places.
The road leading to Koptyaki is clay near that gully. If we buried
them there without onlookers, not even the devil would find them. To
bury them and to drive by with the string of carts would result in a
mishmash and that would be that. So there were three plans. There
was nothing to drive, there was no car. I went to the head of the
military transportation garage to find out if there were any cars.
There was a car, but it was the chief's. I forgot his surname; it
turned out he was a scoundrel and, it seems, he was executed in
Perm. Comrade Pavel Petrovich Gorbunov, who is now deputy chairman
of the state bank, was the manager of the garage or deputy chairman
of military transportation. I do not remember which. I told him I
needed a car urgently. He said "I know what for." He gave me the
chairman's car. I drove to Voikov, head of supply in the Urals, to
get petrol or kerosene, sulphuric acid too (to disfigure the faces)
and, besides that, spades. I commandeered ten carts without drivers
from the prison. Everything was loaded on and we drove off. The
truck was sent there. I stayed to wait for Polushin, the main
"specialist" in burning who had disappeared somewhere. I waited for
him at Voikov's. I waited for him in vain until 11 p.m. Then I heard
he had ridden off on horseback to come to me but he fell off the
horse, hurt his foot, and he could not ride. Since we could not
afford to get stuck with the car again, I rode off on horseback
about midnight with a comrade (I don't remember who) to the place
the corpses were. But I also had back luck. The horse hesitated,
dropped to its knees and somehow fell on its side and come down on
my foot. I lay there an hour or more until I could get on the horse
again. We arrived late at night. The work extracting [the corpses]
was going on. I decided to bury some corpses on the road. We began
to dig a pit. At dawn it was almost ready, but a comrade came to me
and said that despite the order not to let anybody come near, a man
acquainted with Yermakov had appeared from somewhere and had been
allowed to stay at a distance. From there it was possible to see
some kind of digging because there were heaps of clay everywhere.
Though Yermakov guaranteed that he could not see anything, another
Comrade (not the one who had spoken to me) began to demonstrate that
from where he had stood it was impossible not to see. So that plan was ruined too. We decided to fill in the pit.
Waiting for evening, we piled into the cart. The truck waited for us
in a place where it seemed impossible to get stuck. (The driver was
Zlokazov's worker Lyukhanov.) We headed for the Siberian high road.
Having crossed the railroad, we transferred two corpses to the
truck, but it soon got stuck again. We struggled for about two
hours. It was almost midnight. Then I decided that we should do the
burying somewhere around there, because at that late hour nobody
actually could see us. Only the watchman of the passing track saw
several men, because I sent for ties to cover the place where the
corpses would be put. The explanation for needing ties was: The ties
had to be laid for a truck to pass over. I forgot to say that we got
stuck twice that evening or, to be precise, that night. About two
months ago, I was looking through the book by Sokolov, the
preliminary investigator of the extremely important cases under
Kolchak, when I saw a photo of those stacked ties. It was mentioned
that the ties had been laid there to let a truck pass. So, having
dug up the entire area, they did not think to look under the ties.
It is necessary to say that all our men were so tired. They did not
want to dig a new grave. But as it always happens in such cases, two
or three men started working, then the others began. A fire was made
and while the graves where being prepared we burned two corpses:
Alexei and Demidova. The pit was dug near the fire. The bones were
buried, the land was leveled. A big fire was made again and all the
traces were covered with ashes. Before putting the other corpses
into the pit we poured sulpheric acid over them. The pit was filled
up and covered with the ties. The empty truck drove over the ties
several times and rolled them flat. At 5 - 6 o'clock in the morning,
I assembled everybody and stated the importance of the work
completed. I warned everybody to forget the things they saw and
never speak about them with anybody. Then we went back to the town.
Having lost us, the fellows from the regional Cheka, such as
Comrades Isay Rodzinsky, Gorin and somebody else arrived when we had
already finished everything. In the evening of the 19th I went to Moscow with my report. Documentation Centre of the Social Organization of the
Sverdlosk Region (DCSOSR) F. 41 Op. 1.D. 151, L. 10-22. Original. This information is for educational purposes only and is
protected by copyright belonging to V.V. Alekseyev and the
Interregional Fund "Russian Heritage" 1996. It may not be reproduced
or used commercially without prior written approval of the copyright
holders. Please send your comments on this page and the Time Machine to
boba@pallasweb.com
Yakov Sverdlov – Russiapedia Leaders Prominent Russians “Defending” the working class On April 30, 1896, at the age of 11, Sverdlov was admitted into the first
grade of the Nizhny Novgorod Provincial Gymnasium. Yakov’s relationship with
his teachers was far from perfect. Many times he protested against the
school regulations, which irritated many of his tutors. Eventually tiring of
the combative Sverdlov, they expelled him after finishing only five grades.
His young age notwithstanding, Yakov developed an intense desire to
devote all his energy to defending the rights of the working class. After he
was expelled from school, Sverdlov found work as an apprentice in a
pharmacist’s shop in the township of Kanavin near Nizhny Novgorod. The town
was the site of a big lumberyard and a huge number of workers. There Yakov
came into contact with workers who always shared stories about the hardships
of their everyday life, and Sverdlov eventually spoke to his father about
his revolutionary ideas. By that time, the home of the Sverdlovs in Nizhny
Novgorod was used as a hiding-place for visiting revolutionaries, and the
half-century old idea of toppling the monarchy was gaining popularity in the
region. Later on Yakov’s father began to sell illegal literature and even
arms. In 1902 Sverdlov joined the Russian Social Democratic Workers Party. He
distributed social-democratic literature and raised funds for party needs.
In addition, he set up an underground printing press. In 1903, when the
party was divided into the moderate Mensheviks and more radical Bolsheviks,
Sverdlov decided to join the Bolshevik faction. From then on, he always
displayed his ardent support for Vladimir Lenin. Sverdlov took part in
the 1905 Russian Revolution. By that time he had been placed in charge of
several Bolshevik organizations in the Ural Mountains region. During that
period he developed a reputation as one of the party's leading public
speakers. The same year he and his wife Elizaveta Schmidt had their
daughter, Elena. Arrest, exile, and a bit of freedom During his first years in prison, Sverdlov was allowed time to read and
educate himself. He also tried to plan various escapes, occasionally
succeeding. During one of his periods on the run, he married his second wife
Klavdia Novgorodtseva, who bore him two children and stayed with Sverdlov
until the end of his days. During one of his successful escapes in 1912, he
managed to get to St. Petersburg, where he became a member of the Bolshevik
Party Central Committee. However, in 1913 Sverdlov’s whereabouts were discovered by police agent
Roman Malinovsky. Yakov was exiled to Turukhansk in Eastern Siberia. For
three years he shared his flat with another exiled revolutionary, Joseph
Stalin, the future notorious Soviet ruler. At the beginning of their time
together, both of them were quite tolerant of each other. But later on,
their relationship became significantly strained, and they often had
quarrels. Yakov, in spite of the poverty he experienced during his youth,
was brought up in the traditions of the Russian intelligentsia, and found
Stalin’s manners lacking. For example, Sverdlov would wash his dishes after every meal, but Stalin
did not bother to, occasionally giving his plate to his dog to lick it
clean. Additionally irksome was that Stalin’s dog was called Yashka, a
diminutive nickname for Yakov. Revolutionary years In the fall of 1917, it was Yakov Sverdlov who was responsible for the
so-called “workflow of the Revolution”. At the beginning of October he
personally recruited people for the revolutionary committee. Close to the
day of the Bolshevik Revolution, he supervised the actions of the Russian
Provisional Government members (On the first day of the uprising they were
arrested in their residence in the Winter Palace). After the Bolsheviks had
taken power, at the assembly of the Second Congress of the Soviets, Sverdlov
was elected Chairman of the All-Russian Central Executive Committee. He
personally supervised the process of sending telegrams all over the country
with the news that the Bolsheviks had taken power in Russia. At the time, Sverdlov was the official head of the country, but in
reality he always took orders from Lenin. However, he saved Lenin several
times, as there were moments when Sverdlov was the only member of the
Central Committee to support the mastermind of the revolution, and all the
deputies only later took his side. In January 1918, Sverdlov played an
important role in persuading the Bolshevik leaders to support the closure of
the Russian Parliament, a constituent assembly that represented various
political parties. He led the campaign to create the peace treaty admitting
Russia’s defeat in World War I, known as the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk. Many
eyewitnesses said that Lenin merely put forward theories of the revolution,
leaving Sverdlov to apply them in practice. He supported acts of violence
against those loyal to the Tsar, a policy later known as “The Red Terror”.
Some modern historians, journalists, and investigators managed to obtain
documents proving it was Yakov Sverdlov behind the execution of the royal
family that took place near the city of Ekaterinburg on July 16, 1918. Death and aftermath In 1924 the city of Ekaterinburg was renamed into Sverdlovsk. In 1991,
Russian President Boris Yelstin who was born in that part of the country
returned the city’s original name. However, to this day the region around
Ekaterinburg is still called the “Sverdlovsk region”. Written by Oleg Dmitriev, RT Errors & omissions, broken links,
cock ups, over-emphasis, malice [ real or imaginary ] or whatever; if
you find any I am open to comment. Updated on
17/08/2022 12:19
"The 62 members of the [Central] Committee were composed of five Russians,
one Ukrainian, six Letts [Latvians], two Germans, one Czech, two Armenians,
three Georgians, one Karaim [Karaite] (a Jewish sect), and 41 Jews.
NB This source, now, in 2018 at
The Fate of the Romanovs Cassiopaea Forum [
https://cassiopaea.org/forum/threads/the-fate-of-the-romanovs.9637/#post-66740
]
has changed, claiming that Mr Wilton was a liar with an agenda.
QUOTE
Another interesting item that raises a
question that I will ask at the end of this quote:
Quote from: Douglas Reed
THE WORLD REVOLUTION AGAIN
The
simultaneous triumphs of Bolshevism in Moscow and Zionism in
London in the same week of 1917 [ See
Balfour Declaration
& the October Revolution
- Editor ] were only in appearance distinct
events. en shown in an
earlier chapter, and the hidden men who promoted Zionism through the
Western governments also supported the world-revolution. The two
forces fulfilled correlative tenets of the ancient Law: "Pull down
and destroy . . . rule over all nations"; the one destroyed in the
East and the other secretly ruled in the West.
1917 gave proof of Disraeli's dictum about the revolution in its
1848 phase, when he said that Jews headed "every one" of the secret
societies and aimed to destroy Christianity. The controlling group
that emerged in 1917 was so preponderantly Jewish that it may be
called Jewish. The nature of the instigating force then became a
matter of historical fact, not of further polemical debate. It was
further identified by its deeds: the character of its earliest
enactments, a symbolic mockery of Christianity, and a special mark
of authorship deliberately given to the murder of the monarch. All
these bore the traits of a Talmudic vengeance.
In the forty years that have passed great efforts have been made to
suppress public knowledge of this fact, which has been conclusively
established, by non-sequential rebukes to any who claim to discuss
history. For instance, in the 1950's an able (and deservedly
respected) Jewish writer in America, Mr. George Sokolsky, in
criticizing a book previously cited wrote, "It is impossible to read
it without reaching the conclusion that Professor
Beaty [ the author of
The Iron Curtain Over America
] seeks to
prove that Communism is a Jewish movement". In respect of the
leadership it was that for a long period before 1917 (as to later
and the present situation, subsequent chapters will look at the
evidence). It was not a conspiracy of all Jews, but neither were the
French revolution, Fascism and National Socialism conspiracies of
all Frenchmen, Italians or Germans. The organizing force and the
leadership were drawn from the Talmudic-controlled Jewish areas of
Russia, and in that sense Communism was demonstrably Eastern Jewish.
As to the purposes revealed when the revolution struck in 1917,
these showed that it was not episodic or spontaneous but the third
"eruption" of the organization first revealed through Weishaupt. The
two main features reappeared: the attack on all legitimate
government of any kind whatsoever and on religion. Since 1917 the
world-revolution has had to cast aside the earlier pretence of being
directed only against "kings" or the political power of priests.
One authority of that period knew and stated this. In the tradition
of Edmund Burke and John Robison, George Washington and Alexander
Hamilton and Disraeli, Mr. Winston Churchill wrote:
"It would almost seem as if
the gospel of Christ and the gospel of anti-Christ were designed
to originate among the same people; and that this mystic and
mysterious race had been chosen for the supreme manifestations,
both of the divine and the diabolical. . . From the days of
'Spartacus' Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to
Trotsky
(Russia),
Béla Kun
(Hungary),
Rosa Luxemburg(Germany) and Emma
Goldman (United States), this worldwide conspiracy for the
overthrow of civilization and for the reconstitution of society
on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence and
impossible equality, has been steadily growing. It played, as a
modern writer, Mrs. Nesta Webster, has so ably shown, a
definitely recognizable part in the tragedy of the French
Revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive
movement during the nineteenth century; and now at last this
band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the
great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian
people by the hair of their heads and have become practically
the undisputed masters of that enormous empire. There is no need
to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and
in the bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these
international and for the most part atheistical Jews. It is
certainly a very great one; it probably outweighs all others".
The fact of Jewish leadership was a supremely important piece of
knowledge and the later suppression of it, where public debate would
have been sanative, produced immense effects in weakening the West.
The formulation of any rational State policy becomes impossible when
such major elements of knowledge are excluded from public
discussion; it is like playing billiards with twisted cues and
elliptical balls. The strength of the conspiracy is shown by its
success in this matter (as in the earlier period, of Messrs.
Robison, Barruel and Morse) more than by any other thing.
At the time, the facts were available. The British Government's
White Paper of 1919 (Russia, No. 1, a Collection of Reports on
Bolshevism) quoted the report sent to Mr. Balfour in London in 1918
by the Netherlands Minister at Saint Petersburg, M. Oudendyke:
"Bolshevism is organized and
worked by Jews, who have no nationality and whose one object is
to destroy for their own ends the existing order of things".
"The Bolshevik leaders here,
most of whom are Jews and 90 percent of whom are returned
exiles, care little for Russia or any other country but are
internationalists and they are trying. to start a worldwide
social revolution".
This was Mr. Robert Wilton, correspondent of the London Times,
who experienced the Bolshevik revolution. The French edition of
his book included the official Bolshevik lists of the membership of
the ruling revolutionary bodies (they were omitted from the English
edition).
These records show that the Central Committee of the Bolshevik
party, which wielded the supreme power, contained 3
Russians (including Lenin) and 9 Jews. The next body in importance,
the Central Committee of the Executive Commission (or secret police)
comprized 42 Jews and 19 Russians, Letts, Georgians and others. The
Council of People's Commissars consisted of 17 Jews and five others.
The Moscow Cheka (secret police) was formed of 23 Jews and 13
others. Among the names of 556 high officials of the Bolshevik state
officially published in 1918-1919, were 458 Jews and 108 others.
Among the central committees of small, supposedly "Socialist" or
other non-Communist parties (during that early period the semblance
of "opposition" was permitted, to beguile the masses, accustomed
under the Czar to opposition parties) were 55 Jews and 6 others. All
the names are given in the original documents reproduced by Mr.
Wilton. (In parentheses, the composition of the two short-lived
Bolshevik governments outside Russia in 1918-1919, namely those of
Hungary and Bavaria, was similar).
Mr. Wilton made a great and thankless effort to tell newspaper
readers what went on in Russia (broken, he survived only a few years
and died in his fifties). He did not choose the task of reporting
the most momentous event that ever came in any journalist's path of
duty; it devolved on him. Educated in Russia, he knew the country
and its language perfectly, and was held in high esteem by the
Russians and the British Embassy alike. He watched the rioting from
the window of The Times office, adjoining the Prefecture where the
ministers of the collapsing regime took refuge. Between the advent
of the Kerensky government in the spring of 1917 and the seizure of
power by the Bolsheviks in November 1917, his duty was to report an
entirely new phenomenon in world affairs: the rise of a Jewish
regime to despotic supremacy in Russia and to overt control of the
world-revolution.
At that moment he was made to realize that he would not be
allowed faithfully to report the fact.
The secret story is told, with surprising candour, in the Official
History of his paper, The Times, published in 1952. It shows the
hidden mechanism which operated, as early as 1917, to prevent the
truth about the revolution reaching the peoples of the West.
This volume pays tribute to the quality of Mr. Wilton's reporting,
and his standing in Russia, before 1917. Then the tone of the
references to him abruptly changes. Mr. Wilton's early warnings of
what was to come in 1917, says the book, "did not at once affect the
policy of the paper, partly because their writer did not command
full confidence".
Why, if his earlier work and reputation were so good? The reason
transpires.
The narrative continues that Mr. Wilton began to complain about the
"burking" or suppression of his messages. Then The Times began to
publish articles about Russia from men who had little knowledge of
that country. As a result the editorial articles about Russia
took on the tone, exasperating to Mr. Wilton, with which
newspaper-readers became familiar in the following decades: "those
who believe in the future of Russia as a free and efficient
democracy will watch the vindication of the new regime with patient
confidence and earnest sympathy". (Every incident of Mr. Wilton's
experience in Moscow, which Colonel Repington [
Charles à Court Repington?
] was sharing in London,
was repeated in my own experience, and in that of other
correspondents, in Berlin in 1933-1938).
The "interregnum of five months began, during which a Jewish regime
was to take over from Kerensky. At this very moment his newspaper
lost "confidence" in Mr. Wilton.
Why?
The explanation emerges. The Official History of The Times says, "It
was not happy for Wilton that one of his messages . . . should
spread to Zionist circles, and even into the Foreign Office, the
idea that he was an anti-Semite".
"Zionist circles", the reader will observe; not even "Communist
circles"; here the working partnership becomes plain. Why should
"Zionists" (who wanted the British government to procure them "a
homeland" in Palestine) be affronted because a British correspondent
in Moscow reported that a Jewish regime was preparing to take over
in Russia?
Mr. Wilton was reporting the nature of the coming regime; this was
his job.
In the opinion of "Zionists", this was "anti-Semitism", and the mere
allegation was enough to destroy "confidence" in him at his head
office. How, then, could he have remained "happy" and have retained
"confidence". Obviously, only by misreporting events in Russia. In
effect, he was expected not to mention the determining fact of the
day's news!
When I read this illuminating account I wondered by what route
"Zionist circles" had spread to "the Foreign Office", and the
Foreign Office to Printing House Square the "idea" that Mr. Wilton
was "an anti-Semite".
The researcher, like the lonely prospector, learns to expect little
for much toil, but in this case I was startled by the large nugget
of truth which I found in The Times Official History thirty-five
years after the event. It said that "the head of propaganda at
the Foreign Office sent to the Editor a paper by one of his staff"
repeating the "allegation", (which apparently was first printed in
some Zionist sheet). The Official History revealed even the identity
of this assiduous "one".
It was a young Mr.
Reginald Leeper, who three decades later (as
Sir Reginald) became British Ambassador in Argentina.
I then looked to Who's Who for information about Mr. Leeper's career
and found that his first recorded employment began (when he was
twenty-nine) in 1917: "entered International Bureau, Department of
Information in 1917". Mr. Leeper's memorandum about Mr. Wilton was
sent to The Times early in May 1917. Therefore, if he entered the
Foreign Office on New Year's day of 1917, he had been in it just
four months when he conveyed to The Times his "allegation" about the
exceptionally qualified Mr. Wilton, of seventeen years service with
that paper, and the effect was immediate; the Official History says
that Mr. Wilton's despatches thereafter, during the decisive period,
either miscarried or "were ignored".
(The editor was the same of whom Colonel Repington complained in
1917-1918 and to whom the present writer sent his resignation in
1938 on the same basic principle of reputable journalism.)
Mr. Wilton Struggled on for a time, continually protesting against
the "burking" and suppression of his despatches, and then as his
last service to truthful journalism put all that he knew into his
book. He recognized and recorded the acts which identified the
especial nature of the regime: the law against "anti-Semitism", the
anti-Christian measures, the canonization of Judas Iscariot, and the
Talmudic fingerprint mockingly left in the death-chamber of the
Romanoffs.
The law against "anti-Semitism" (which cannot be defined) was in
itself a fingerprint. An illegal government, predominantly Jewish,
by this measure warned the Russian masses, under pain of death, not
to interest themselves in the origins of the revolution. It meant in
effect that the Talmud became the law of Russia, and in the
subsequent four decades this law has in effect and in growing degree
been made part of the structure of the west.
UNQUOTE
He is not beating about the bush.
Robert Archibald Wilton (31 July 1868 –
18 or 19 January 1925) was a
right-wing
British
journalist and an
antisemite. He was a proponent of
blood libel and claimed that execution of the Romanovs was a ritual
murder by the Jews.
External links
17 Russians
2 Ukrainians
11 Armenians
35 Latvians
15 Germans
1 Hungarian
10 Georgians
3 Poles
3 Finns
1 Czech
1 Karaim
457 Jews
556 Total 82% Jews
QUOTE
The head of Russia’s Orthodox Church is launching an investigation into
whether the last Czar of Russia, Nicholas II, and his family were victims
of a ritual murder carried out by angry Jews in 1918, Church leaders
revealed in a statement Tuesday.
UNQUOTE
Newsweek is tip toeing round the truth & nervous about annoying Jews. Or is
it run by Jews?
Viktor Grünfeld or Anselm Fischer only in the German Wikipedia.
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jakow_Michailowitsch_Swerdlow -
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yakov_Sverdlov
jew
https://www.akg-images.co.uk/archive/-2UMDHUFI0L2Q.html -
Nicholas II / Skulls of
Tsar’s family
QUOTE
When the Bolsheviks seized power in Petrograd on Oct. 25, 1917, the vast
majority of Russia’s Jews opposed that takeover. Five years later, when the
USSR was created at the end of a treacherously bloody civil war, the
situation was reversed—not, as the Hebrew cliché has it, out of the love of
Mordecai, but out of hatred of Haman.
UNQUOTE
Q
QUOTE
Murder of the Imperial Family - The
executioner Yurovsky's account
YUROVSKY'S ACCOUNT
OF
THE EXECUTION
OF THE IMPERIAL FAMILY
Our thanks to Rob Moshein
for transcribing the account as printed in "The Last Act of a
Tragedy" by V.V. Aleskeyev, Yekaterinburg, 1996. ISBN 5-7691-0394-9;
5-7691-0597-6.
UNQUOTE
QUOTE
“Andrey”, “Max”, Smirnov", "Permyakov". This is only a few of the false
names and pseudonyms used by Yakov Sverdlov during his underground
revolutionary activity in various parts of Russia at the beginning of the
20th century. At the age of 32 he was one of the key figures behind the 1917
Bolshevik Revolution. He was a close ally of Vladimir
Lenin and until 1919 he was the official head of the Russian Soviet
Federal Socialist Republic.
Yakov Sverdlov
was born in 1885 in the city of Nizhny Novgorod into the family of a Jewish
engraver. The family lived from hand to mouth. Yakov’s father Mikhail (or
Moishe, as they called him) took a second underground job forging various
documents and stamps for revolutionaries to pay for his children’s
education. His forgeries were so good the police could never tell one of his
fakes from the real article.
In 1906 Sverdlov was
arrested for his illegal activity for the first time. This was the beginning
of a period of time from 1906 until 1917 when he was mostly either
imprisoned or exiled. All in all, Sverdlov was arrested 14 times.
After the 1917 February Revolution,
Sverdlov returned to the capital which at that time had been renamed
Petrograd. He took an active part in the propaganda campaign against
Russia’s participation in WWI, the Bolsheviks calling the conflict
“imperialistic”. In April, Sverdlov went to the Urals to oversee the party
activity in the city of Ekaterinburg. He returned to Petrograd in June and
he was a key figure in organizing the subversive activities of Vladimir
Lenin against the provisional government. As of August 1917, Sverdlov
controlled the organizational bureau of the Central Committee and its
secretariat. Along with Felix Dzerzhinsky, he was the head of the Central
Committee's military commission. In Lenin's absence, it was Sverdlov who
presided at the Central Committee meetings. In all critical circumstances
Sverdlov displayed unquestionable loyalty to Lenin.
There are still many versions of Sverdlov’s
mysterious death on March, 16, 1919. Some researchers are sure that he
died of influenza which he caught in the city of Oryol on one of his
business trips. Others say that he died of tuberculosis (that was Stalin’s
version, which suited him because it portrayed Sverdlov as a martyr who
caught the dangerous disease in exile). According to a third version, he was
heavily hit by a worker at a Moscow factory. Many historians however tend to
believe that his death was not linked to illness, despite the fact that his
health was failing. It was only after his death that Stalin, the person who
had a negative relationship with Sverdlov during their time in exile in
Siberia, began to rise to the highest echelons of power. At Sverdlov’s
funeral, held in the Necropolis close to the Kremlin wall, Lenin spoke for 2
hours about key issues every revolutionary had to keep in mind. He realized
that he had lost his biggest ally in the power struggle within Bolshevik
circles.
UNQUOTE
Email
me at Mike Emery. All
financial contributions are cheerfully accepted. If you want to keep
it private, use my PGP Key. Home
Page