|
July 23,
2005:
Funny
thing: I'm taking a French class in Toulouse. In the class, I met
two Americans who vacation on their boat for two months every year.
It is currently tied up in Toulouse. He is retired from advertising,
she is a school teacher who will retire next year. They made a few
remarks about the U.S. and creeping fascism, so I decided to invite
them down to the house for an afternoon chat.
Well, of
course, we gradually approached the subject of 9-11, but right there
they balked. Yes, they firmly believe that a bunch of Fundies have
taken over the government and they don't like it, but they just had
a lot of trouble "going there" when considering the idea that 9-11
was designed to facilitate the Fundie take-over, and that the
"Fundie" position itself was probably a manipulation.
So, we
lent them David Ray Griffen's book, The New Pearl Harbor, to
sort of "break it to them gently." After a few days, they gave it
back with a sort of stunned look in their eyes, and I gave them a
couple more: Thierry Meyssan's books. A day or so later, the fellow
told me: okay, I can accept that the government might be complicit
in 9-11... but if a 757 didn't hit the Pentagon, what happened to
IT?
And
that's where they got stuck.
They know all about Pearl Harbor and other similar
events, they understand that the U.S. government can, has and DOES
engage in covert operations in order to get the public to support
whatever power mongering urge they may have at
the moment, but that was THEN and this is NOW. It can't happen NOW!
Even though they say "yeah, we agree that nothing about the Pentagon
makes a lick of sense, it sure does SEEM like there was no 757, but
where is the 757, what happened to the people on it? How could so
many people keep quiet?"
Ah, the
64,000 Dollar Question.
I
recently had an exchange with Robin Ramsay, Editor of
Lobster
magazine. The context of the exchange was related to his
recent "Konspiracy Korner" piece published in Fortean Times, one of
my favorite magazines (though I am now wondering just what is going
on over there at FT?)
After
writing a rather long post that included a lot of chunks of material
from our research and the research of others, Mr. Ramsay opined:
"Ultimately it comes down to how you see the world. The kind of
conspiracy you are describing, or implying, is inconceivable to
me: too big, too complex, too likely to go wrong or be
discovered, ever to be mounted. What you are describing ... is
vastly much bigger - and more complex and more dangerous - than
any known mind control/psyops project. And there is no evidence
for it. [...]
Those - like you - who argue for a U.S. state conspiracy are
proposing a massive, multi-agency conspiracy of a kind which has
never been seen before. All the U.S. state agencies hate each
other and barely co-operate, engage in endless turf wars. The
kind of inter-agency operation you are proposing simply has
never existed in peace time. It is inconceivable to me that such
a group could be got together. And this is probably the main
reason that the official U.S. state organisations and
politicians have never taken the conspiracy theories seriously.
They know how the U.S. state operates and thus dismiss this idea
at the outset. (And the official inquiry into 9-11 is full of
examples of the hostility between state agencies.) In reality,
when the planes hit the towers a large slice of the U.S.
military and intelligence bodies immediately thought of Bin
Laden. And they have never had a good reason to change their
minds - not least because Bin Laden and his various cohorts have
admitted - boasted of - doing it."
And
there is the rub: undoubtedly, Robin Ramsay's remarks are "on
target" in many respects. And yet, there is the mountain of evidence
- much of it circumstantial but so compelling that it would be
accepted in a court of law - that there IS such a gigantic
conspiracy, and that the "power elite" - individuals who may be
completely unknown to us since the highest level politicians and
bankers may only be their "pawns" - are somehow, at the top of the
heap, controlling everything beneath them including the governments
of various countries.
Boy,
does that ever sound crazy! But before you reject such an idea out
of hand, let me quote a bit from an article I wrote shortly after
the Oklahoma City bombing:
"When I saw the face of the alleged Oklahoma Bomber, Timothy
McVeigh, I knew I had seen that expression before. I couldn't
quite place the memory until a few days later when I read a
newspaper account that reported McVeigh as saying that the
government had implanted a computer chip in his hip to track
him! The bells rang and the light bulb lighted and I remembered
where I had seen that "face" before.
He was young, about 26 or 27, blond, blue-eyed, clean- cut,
powerfully built and definitely suffering. His body- language
said it all. The young man sitting across from me in my
hypnotherapy consulting room was overwhelmed by terror. His eyes
darted to the right and the left as though expecting a blow from
any quarter, and he was coiled as tightly as an overwound clock
spring. His story was not entirely unique, but the level to
which it had affected him was profound, possibly the worst I had
seen, and I knew he needed help NOW.
Several months ago I was contacted by the owner of a large book
store in a nearby city. She frequently refers clients to me for
hypnosis. Generally they are the run-of-the-mill New Agers
desiring past-life regressions out of simple curiosity, but
sometimes the situations are quite serious and troubling. Luke's
case, (a pseudonym) was one of the latter.
Maggie, (pseudonym), the book store owner, sponsors and promotes
many book signings, seminars and classes that are held in the
reading room of her store and she had met Luke at one of these.
She knew something was troubling him, but it was some time
before he confided in her. Now, he was telling his story to me.
"The government is experimenting on me," he revealed in
embarrassed anguish. "I don't know why or how, but there are a
lot of people in on this and they are trying to drive me crazy."
"What makes you think the government is experimenting on you?" I
asked.
"I KNOW they are. They have my house bugged, my phone is tapped,
they have some kind of thing planted in me to control my
thoughts, and they have people everywhere watching me."
"What kind of people are watching you, where are they, and how
do you know this?"
"The people who live around me are part of the project. They
have them planted everywhere -- at McDonalds, at the laundromat,
in the stores, at the restaurant, where I work. They put drugs
into my food to knock me out and then they come and take me and
experiment on me. Then, when they put me back, I can hear the
people next door discussing me." He paused and looked at me
pleadingly. "I know you think I am crazy, but you have to
believe me. Something REAL is happening to me. It is not just in
my mind and I am not making it up. I sleep with a gun under my
pillow because someday they are going to make a mistake and I am
not going to be completely out when they come!"
And the story goes on. Luke's anguish, paranoia and utter terror
were real and tangible. This kid really believed what he was
saying. For a few moments I toyed with the thought that he
really ought to be hospitalized immediately as a danger to
himself and others, but, the thing is, I had heard this sort of
thing before to one extent or another. [Note: Because of the
nature of his problems and the possibility that he was, in fact,
manifesting schizophrenia, I DID refer him to a local
psychological unit for evaluation. Whether he went or not, I'll
probably never know, but I knew that a case as severe as his was
simply out of my range of expertise and ethical responsibility.]
Last year I met a young woman at a local gathering for people
interested in Eastern Healing Techniques. She was a well-to-do
stockbroker's wife, stylish and vivacious. But, she took me
aside and told me that her life was crashing around her because
she had gone out for a drink with one of her husband's
co-workers and he had taken her out to a remote area and she
couldn't remember what happened to her there. She was sure, from
bits and pieces she could pull together in her head, that this
guy was a government agent, he had been a Navy S.E.A.L., her
phone was tapped, they were watching her, and she was the
subject of some kind of government experiment. She was
distraught to the point of being unable to function. Her
marriage was falling apart, her children were virtually
abandoned by her efforts to find out what was going on in her
life, and she was on the brittle edge of a breakdown.
In recent months I have talked to a dozen or more people who
whisper to me about "white vans, death camps," the "Protocols of
the Elders of Zion" and the institution of martial law. They
seem to be roughly divided into two groups: those who are
involved in metaphysics and UFO phenomena and those who are not.
The former group tend to talk about conspiracy in terms of "UFO
cover-up" and captured "alien technology" which is going to be
used by the Industrial-Military Complex to control us and then
institute a One World Government. The latter group, resurrecting
the frightening specter of pre-Nazi thought and philosophy,
interprets the conspiracy as an event or series of historical
events, leading up to this moment in time wherein the groundwork
is being laid for the dreaded "New World Order." They blame it
on the Jews, the Blacks, the Masons, the Templars, and assorted
other "secret societies" which have infiltrated and control the
government.
And now we have the Oklahoma Bombing. What are we to make of all
of this?
Well, FDR was reported as having once said that "nothing in
politics happens by accident." If any event leads to a specific
result, we have the right to conjecture that that result was the
desired objective and to ask: cui bono? Who benefits?
So, what did I find out from my various subjects who were being
"persecuted by the government?" In all cases, after one or more
hypnosis sessions, the scenario that played itself out was quite
similar. All claimed to have been repeatedly abducted by
"aliens" since childhood and their abductors were the ubiquitous
Grays. All claimed to have been implanted with control and
measuring devices which both transmitted and received. All
claimed to have been given screen memories that the abductions
were done by humans in uniform. In several cases, I was able to
demonstrate that the so-called "Grey Aliens" were, in fact, a
screen memory of HUMAN abductions!
And, what about Timothy McVeigh? Well, Dr. Jacques Vallee once
proposed the idea that one way to stop a train is to accelerate
it to the point that it jumps the track. I think this is what we
are dealing with here.
Was Timothy McVeigh abducted and implanted? Was he controlled
and manipulated to do what he did? We have only to look at the
POLITICAL results to see what the objective was. What is the
rhetoric in the media? What institutional actions are being
taken? What public feeling is being engendered by this event?
Remember, nothing in politics happens by accident, from Pearl
Harbor, the assassination of JFK, to the Oklahoma Bombing. We
are all victims."
The
late Jim Keith, one of the foremost writers and researchers on
political conspiracy in the world in recent times wrote in his book,
Mass Control:
"Agents of the world's elite have been long engaged in a war on
the populace of Earth. Greed is the motivation for this war, a
greed so pervasive that it encompasses the planet and all of the
beings on it, but in recent times a philosophy has been used to
justify that greed. It is the philosophy of mass control, that
ultimately aims at dictating every aspect of human life - even
remolding man's perception of reality and himself." [Jim Keith,
Mass Control: Engineering Human Consciousness]
There is a little known fact about hypnosis that is illustrated by
the following story:
A
subject was told under hypnosis that when he was awakened he would
be unable to see a third man in the room who, it was suggested to
him, would have become invisible. All the "proper" suggestions to
make this "true" were given, such as "you will NOT see so- and-so"
etc... When the subject was awakened, lo and behold! the suggestions
did NOT work.
Why?
Because they went against his belief system. He did NOT believe that
a person could become invisible.
So,
another trial was made. The subject was hypnotized again and was
told that the third man was leaving the room... that he had
been called away on urgent business, and the scene of him getting on
his coat and hat was described... the door was opened and shut to
provide "sound effects," and then the subject was brought out of the
trance.
Guess what happened?
He
was UNABLE TO SEE the Third Man.
Why?
Because his perceptions were modified according to his beliefs.
Certain "censors" in his brain were activated in a manner that was
acceptable to his ego survival instincts.
The
ways and means that we ensure survival of the ego are established
pretty early in life by our parental and societal programming. This
conditioning determines what IS or is NOT possible; what we are
"allowed" to believe in order to be accepted. We learn this first by
learning what pleases our parents and then later we modify our
belief based on what pleases our society - our peers - to believe.
Anyway, to return to our story, the Third Man went about the room
picking things up and setting them down and doing all sorts of
things to test the subject's awareness of his presence, and the
subject became utterly hysterical at this "anomalous" activity! He
could see objects moving through the air, doors opening and closing,
but he could NOT see the SOURCE because he did not believe that
there was another man in the room.
So,
what are the implications of this factor of human consciousness? (By
the way, this is also the reason why most therapy to stop bad habits
does not work - they attempt to operate against a "belief system"
that is imprinted in the subconscious that this or that habit is
essential to survival.)
One
of the first things we might observe is that everyone has a
different set of beliefs based upon their social and familial
conditioning, and that these beliefs determine how much of the
OBJECTIVE reality anyone is able to access.
In
the above story, the objective reality IS WHAT IT IS, whether
it is truly objective, or only a consensus reality. In this story,
there is clearly a big part of that reality that is inaccessible to
the subject due to a perception censor which was activated
by the suggestions of the hypnotist. That is to say, the subject
has a strong belief, based upon his CHOICE as to who or what to
believe - the hypnotist or his own, unfettered observations of
reality. In this case, he has chosen to believe the hypnotist and
not what he might be able to observe if he dispensed with the
perception censor put in place by the hypnotist who activated his
"belief center" - even if that activation was fraudulent.
And
so it is with nearly all human beings: we believe the hypnotist -
the "official culture" - and we are able, with preternatural
cunning, to deny what is often right in front of our faces. And in
the case of the hypnosis subject, he is entirely at the mercy of the
"Invisible Man" because he chooses not to see him.
Let's face it: we are all taught to avoid uncomfortable realities.
Human beings - faced with unpleasant truths about themselves or
their reality - react like alcoholics who refuse to admit their
condition, or the cuckolded husband who is the "last to know," or
the wife who does not notice that her husband is abusing her
daughter.
In
States of Denial: Knowing about
Atrocities and Suffering, (Cambridge: Polity Press;
Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers, 2001), Stanley Cohen discusses the
subject of denial which may shed some light on the subject.
Denial is a complex "unconscious
defense mechanism for coping with guilt, anxiety and other
disturbing emotions aroused by reality."
Denial can be both deliberate and intentional, as well as completely
subconscious. An individual who is deliberately and intentionally
denying something is acting from an individual level of lying,
concealment and deception. Among the larger population of decent
human beings, this is not our problem. It is certainly the problem
with those at the top, who then exert a controlling influence on the
masses of humanity, but when we talk about ordinary people, what we
are dealing with is denial that is subconscious and therefore
organized and "institutional." This implies propaganda,
misinformation, whitewash, manipulation, spin, disinformation, etc.
Believing anything that comes down the pike is not the opposite of
denial. "Acknowledgement" of the probability of a high level of
Truth about a given matter is what should happen when people are
actively aroused by certain information. This information can
be 1) factual or forensic truth; that is to say, legal or scientific
information which is factual, accurate and objective; it is obtained
by impartial procedures; 2) personal and narrative truth including
"witness testimonies." The timeline to which these remarks
serve as an introduction, attempts to provide as many of these
elements as possible.
I
should add here that skepticism and solipsistic arguments -
including epistemological relativism - about the existence of
objective truth, are generally a social construction and might be
considered in the terms of the hypnotized man who has been
programmed to think that there "is no truth" so why bother even
looking for it?
Denial occurs for a variety of reasons. There are truths that are
"clearly known," but for many reasons - personal or political,
justifiable or unjustifiable - are concealed, or it is agreed that
they will not be acknowledged "out loud." There are "unpleasant
truths" and there are truths that make us tired because if we
acknowledge them - if we do more than give them a tacit nod - we may
find it necessary to make changes in our lives.
Cohen points out that "All counter-claims about the denied reality
are themselves only manoeuvres in endless truth-games. And truth,
as we know, is inseparable from power." Denial of truth is,
effectively, giving away your power.
Now,
let's take a brief look at science which is one of the mainstays of
Official Culture.
As Ark has written, science seems to be controlled by money.
Scientists, for the most part, HAVE to work on those things that get
funding. There is nothing terribly unusual about that since that is
a general rule for everyone. If you don't get money for your work,
you starve and then you don't do any work at all. Yes, that's
somewhat simplistic, but still relevant to the subject here.
Those who read our Timeline of secret and not-so-secret scientific
projects - and those involved in them - may like to close their eyes
to this evidence that science has most definitely been used in a
very detrimental way in our world. After all, such ideas - when they
are brought to public attention - are generally dismissed as
"conspiracy theory" and are thus deemed unworthy of attention.
So
please, bear with me a moment here and let's apply a little logic to
the problem.
The
first thing we want to think about is the fact that the word
"conspiracy" evokes such a strong reaction in all of us: nobody
wants to be branded as a "conspiracy theorist." It just isn't
"acceptable." It's "un-scientific" or it's evidence of mental
instability. Right? That's what you are thinking, isn't it?
In
fact, I bet that the very reading of the word even produces certain
physiological reactions: a slight acceleration of the heartbeat, and
perhaps a quick glance around to make sure that no one was watching
while you simply read the word silently.
Have
you ever asked yourself WHY the word evokes such an instantaneous
emotional reaction? Have you ever wondered why it stimulates such a
strong "recoil?" After all, it is only a word. It only describes the
idea of people in "high places" thinking about things and doing
things that manipulate other people to produce benefits for
themselves.
Richard M. Dolan studied at Alfred University and Oxford
University before completing his graduate work in history at the
University of Rochester, where he was a finalist for a Rhodes
scholarship. Dolan studied U.S. Cold War strategy, Soviet history
and culture, and international diplomacy. He has written about
"conspiracy" in the following way:
"The very label [conspiracy] serves as an automatic dismissal,
as though no one ever acts in secret. Let us bring some
perspective and common sense to this issue.
The United States comprises large organizations - corporations,
bureaucracies, "interest groups," and the like - which are
conspiratorial by nature. That is, they are hierarchical, their
important decisions are made in secret by a few key
decision-makers, and they are not above lying about their
activities. Such is the nature of organizational behavior.
"Conspiracy," in this key sense, is a way of life around the
globe.
Within the world's military and intelligence apparatuses, this
tendency is magnified to the greatest extreme. During the 1940s,
[...] the military and its scientists developed the world's most
awesome weapons in complete secrecy... [...]
Anyone who has lived in a repressive society knows that official
manipulation of the truth occurs daily. But societies have their
many and their few. In all times and all places, it is the few
who rule, and the few who exert dominant influence over what we
may call official culture. - All elites take care to
manipulate public information to maintain existing structures of
power. It's an old game.
America is nominally a republic and free society, but in reality
an empire and oligarchy, vaguely aware of its own oppression,
within and without. I have used the term "national security
state" to describe its structures of power. It is a convenient
way to express the military and intelligence communities, as
well as the worlds that feed upon them, such as defense
contractors and other underground, nebulous entities. Its
fundamental traits are secrecy, wealth, independence, power, and
duplicity.
Nearly everything of significance undertaken by America's
military and intelligence community in the past half-century has
occurred in secrecy. The undertaking to build an atomic weapon,
better known as the Manhattan Project, remains the great model
for all subsequent activities. For more than two years, not a
single member of Congress even knew about it although its final
cost exceeded two billion dollars.
During and after the Second World War, other important projects,
such as the development of biological weapons, the importation
of Nazi scientists, terminal mind-control experiments,
nationwide interception of mail and cable transmissions of an
unwitting populace, infiltration of the media and universities,
secret coups, secret wars, and assassinations all took place far
removed not only from the American public, but from most members
of Congress and a few presidents. Indeed, several of the most
powerful intelligence agencies were themselves established in
secrecy, unknown by the public or Congress for many years.
Since the 1940s, the U.S. Defense and Intelligence establishment
has had more money at its disposal than most nations. In
addition to official dollars, much of the money is undocumented.
From its beginning, the C.I.A. was engaged in a variety of
off-the-record "business" activities that generated large sums
of cash. The connections of the C.I.A. with global organized
crime (and thus de facto with the international narcotics trade)
has been well established and documented for many years. - Much
of the original money to run the American intelligence community
came from very wealthy and established American families, who
have long maintained an interest in funding national security
operations important to their interests.
In theory, civilian oversight exists over the US national
security establishment. The president is the military
commander-in-chief. Congress has official oversight over the
C.I.A.. The F.B.I. must answer to the Justice Department. In
practice, little of this applies. One reason has to do with
secrecy. [...]
A chilling example of such independence occurred during the
1950s, when President Eisenhower effectively lost control of the
U.S. nuclear arsenal. The situation deteriorated so much that
during his final two years in office, Eisenhower asked
repeatedly for an audience with the head of Strategic Air
Command to learn what America's nuclear retaliatory plan was.
What he finally learned in 1960, his final year in office,
horrified him: half of the Northern Hemisphere would be
obliterated.
If a revered military hero such as Eisenhower could not control
America's nuclear arsenal, nor get a straight answer from the
Pentagon, how on earth could Presidents Truman, Kennedy,
Johnson, or Nixon regarding comparable matters?
Secrecy, wealth and independence add up to power. Through the
years, the national security state has gained access to the
world's most sophisticated technology sealed off millions of
acres of land from public access or scrutiny, acquired unlimited
snooping ability within U.S. borders and beyond, conducted overt
or clandestine actions against other nations, and prosecuted
wars without serious media scrutiny. Domestically, it maintains
influence over elected officials and communities hoping for some
of the billions of defense dollars. [including scientists,
universities, etc.]
Deception is the key element of warfare, and when winning is all
that matters, the conventional morality held by ordinary people
becomes an impediment. When taken together, the examples of
official duplicity form a nearly single totality. They include
such choice morsels as the phony war crisis of 1948, the
fabricated missile gap claimed by the air force during the
1950s, the carefully managed events leading to the Gulf of
Tonkin resolution... [...]
The secrecy stems from a pervasive and fundamental element of
life in our world, that those who are at the top of the heap
will always take whatever steps are necessary to maintain the
status quo.
[S]keptics often ask, "Do you really think the government could
hide [anything] for so long?" The question itself reflects
ignorance of the reality that secrecy is a way of life in the
National Security State. Actually though, the answer is yes, and
no.
Yes, in that cover-ups are standard operating procedure,
frequently unknown to the public for decades, becoming public
knowledge by a mere roll of the dice. But also no, in that ...
information has leaked out from the very beginning. It is
impossible to shut the lid completely. The key lies in
neutralizing and discrediting unwelcomed information, sometimes
through official denial, other times through proxies in the
media.
[E]vidence [of conspiracy] derived from a grass roots level is
unlikely to survive its inevitable conflict with official
culture. And acknowledgement about the reality of [conspiracies]
will only occur when the official culture deems it worthwhile or
necessary to make it. Don't hold your breath.
This is a widespread phenomenon affecting many people,
generating high levels of interest, taking place in
near-complete secrecy, for purposes unknown, by agencies
unknown, with access to incredible resources and technology. A
sobering thought and cause for reflection." [Richard Dolan]
Consider this: even if Dolan is writing specifically about America,
in a world dominated by the United States, it must be considered
that pressures are applied elsewhere from within this "national
security state" to comply with the demands of the U.S..
Now,
think about the word "conspiracy" one more time and allow me to
emphasize the key point: From a historical point of view, the
ONLY reality is that of conspiracy. Secrecy, wealth and
independence add up to power. ...Deception is the key element of
warfare, (the tool of power elites), and when winning is all that
matters, the conventional morality held by ordinary people becomes
an impediment. Secrecy stems from a pervasive and fundamental
element of life in our world, that those who
are at the top of the heap will always take whatever steps are
necessary to maintain the status quo.
And
maintaining the "status quo" in science HAS to be one of the main
objectives of the Power Elite.
And
how do they do that? By "Official Culture."
And
official culture, understood this way, from the perspective of elite
groups wishing to maintain the status quo of their power, means only
one thing: COINTELPRO. And here we do not mean the specific F.B.I.
program, but the concept of the program, and the likelihood that
this has been the mode of controlling human beings for possibly
millennia. Certainly, Machiavelli outlined the principles a very
long time ago and little has changed since.
The
fact is, I like to call it "Cosmic COINTELPRO" to suggest that it is
almost a mechanical system that operates based on the
psychological nature of human beings, most of whom LIKE to live
in denial. After all, "if ignorance is bliss, 'tis folly to be
wise." This is most especially true when we consider the survival
instinct of the ego. If the official culture says that there is no
Third Man in the room, and if it works through the inculcated belief
systems, there is little possibility that the "subject" will be able
to see the source of the phenomena in our world. It will always be
an "invisible Third Man."
Usually, when we think of COINTELPRO, we think of the most well
known and typical activities which include sending anonymous or
fictitious letters - which are sometimes later withdrawn with an
"apology" after they have already accomplished the goal of
destruction; publishing false defamatory or threatening information;
forging signatures on fake documents; introducing disruptive and
subversive members into organizations to destroy them from within,
and so on. Blackmailing insiders in any group to force them to
spread false rumors, or to foment factionalism is also common.
What
a lot of people don't keep in mind is the fact that COINTELPRO also
concentrated on creating bogus organizations and promoting bogus
ideas.
In
the scientific community, this can work in any number of ways, the
most common being "proprietary organizations" that fund research
that leads nowhere in order to keep someone with promising ideas
busy. It is not stretching things to consider that "exciting new
ideas" or areas of research might be promoted for the express
purpose of vectoring scientists into following false and
time-wasting research so as to prevent them making significant
breakthroughs. COINTELPRO was also famous for instigation of hostile
actions through third parties. According to investigators, these
F.B.I. programs were noteworthy because all documents relating to
them were stamped "do not file." This meant that they were never
filed in the system, and for all intents and purposes, did not
exist. This cover was blown after activists broke into an F.B.I.
office in Media, Pennsylvania in 1971. What we do not know is how
far and wide the practice extends, though we can certainly guess.
There exists in our world today a powerful and dangerous
secret cult.
So
wrote Victor Marchetti, a former high-ranking C.I.A. official, in
his book The CIA and the Cult of
Intelligence. This is
the first book the U.S. Government ever went to court to censor
before publication. In this book, Marchetti tells us that there IS a
"Cabal" that rules the world and that its holy men are the
clandestine professionals of the Central Intelligence Agency.
In
our opinion, the C.I.A. is but one "arm" of the cult, just as
Benedictines were but one order of the Catholic Church. To borrow
from, and paraphrasing, Marchetti:
"This cult is patronized and protected by the highest level
government officials in the world. It's membership is composed
of those in the power centers of government, industry, commerce,
finance, and labor. It manipulates
individuals in areas of important public influence -
including the academic world and the mass media.
The Secret Cult is a global fraternity of a political
aristocracy whose purpose is to further the political policies
of persons or agencies unknown. It acts covertly and illegally."
Jim
Keith, wrote in his book,
Mass Control:
"Although the lust for control can be discerned since the
beginning of recorded history, a nexus of particular importance
arose in Germany in the latter half of the 19th century. As the
country increased in military and industrial might, becoming the
strongest power in Europe, a revolution simultaneously took
place in German philosophic and scientific thought that
paradoxically would spread through the world to create positive
technological change as well as to birth innumerable toxic
children. According to one source:
The spread of materialistic philosophy of life was
world-wide in this age, and the idolatry of power was not
confined to Germany, but its corrosive effect was
particularly strong in a country that was not inured to
power. [Germany, History Since 1850, Encyclopedia
Americana, New York: Americana Corporation, 1963]
One aspect of this transformation, this "idolatry of power," was
a negative transformation of the psychological sciences.
In the late 19th century, earlier more humanistic approaches to
understanding mankind were replaced by a scientific philosophy
that would be employed less as a measure for the understanding
of man than as a justification for a new feudalism and a
mechanism of pure control.
The materialist overhauling of psychology was in great part
ushered in by the work of the German psychologist
Wilhelm Maximilian Wundt.
Wundt was a professor of philosophy at the University of
Leipzig, and in 1875 established the worlds first psychological
laboratory there, a move that would eventually turn the world of
more humanistic-oriented psychology on its head. Interesting,
but Wundt's grandfather is documented as having been a member of
the Illuminati secret society, making it not unreasonable
to imagine that Herr professor may also have been a
member of that group.
Wundt, in reflection of a powerful materialistic groundswell in
German thought that began with
Schopenhauer at the beginning of the 19th century and
that was to be later epitomized by Karl
Marx, rejected in cavalier fashion the notion that
man might have a soul or deeper significance than the merely
physical, that he was in fact anything more than an animal.
Following this line of reasoning, an approach that came to be
known in psychology as Structuralism, Wundt insisted that
all psychological studies should depend entirely on the study of
body reactions. The truth of man, Wundt insisted, could be
determined solely through mechanistic means: measurement,
analysis, and dissection of bodies. After Wundt had thoroughly
infused the psychological sciences with his materialist
approach, many scientists - and the members of the ruling class
that employed them - believed that they were justified in
treating human beings as if they were pieces of meat, and as an
overall plan of action, proceeded to do so.
The materialist psychological doctrine spread rapidly with at
least twenty-four laboratories established by Wundt's students
between the years 1883 and 1893, with more of the
German's acolytes fanning out to infiltrate related fields,
such as education. Wundt's materialistic approach would
infect the thinking of most of the influential psychologists,
psychiatrists, educators, and social planners who would follow
in the 20th century.
One man who marched to Wundt's dirge was the Russian,
Ivan Petrovich Pavlov.
Pavlov conducted a wide-ranging research into techniques of
control, primarily using dogs for his experimentation. In the
now-famous experiment, Pavlov fed his dogs, stimulating
salivation, while at the same time ringing a bell. After doing
this many times, Pavlov was able to stimulate salivation in
reaction to the sound of the bell alone. Other of Pavlov's
experiments involved rewarding dogs with petting, or punishing
them with pain. Using these kinds of approaches, Pavlov
developed his theory of the conditioned reflex, demonstrating
that animals are motivated by patterns of conditioned
response, and that conditioning can be artificially
induced. The results of Pavlov's experiments did not escape
the social planners of his day, nor those who would follow."
[Jim Keith, Mass Control: Engineering Human Consciousness]
In
recorded history, we find that the Elite, in their drive for power,
have developed many means of controlling the minds of the masses.
The earliest recorded such event was the appearance of
Yahweh/Jehovah on the World Stage, and things went downhill (or
became easier, depending on your point of view) from there. In the
Eleventh Century, a fellow named Hasan bin Sabah took the idea to an
all new level of direct mind control rather than just general social
contros such as those effected by religion and tribal norms and
taboos.
Hasan
was said to have been a Persian of noble birth who fled Persia after
becoming embroiled in a financial scandal at the Imperial Court.
After finding sanctuary in Egypt, he is reported to have studied the
teachings and organizational structure of an underground cult known
as the Dar ul Hikmat.
During this same time frame, he is also said to have mastered the
Dark Arts of Kaballah. This event was to have far reaching results.
In actual fact, we here approach a very mysterious thing: a
conjunction of Freemasonry and a Secret Cult of Judaism.
These fanatical groups, exercised from their inaccessible
strongholds an influence out of all proportion to their size. On
August 8, 1164, the Persian Nizariyya from their seat of Alamut,
the 'Eagles Nest', proclaimed the 'Great Resurrection', the
Paradise on Earth which no longer recognizes any law. This,
seems to be the source of a much cited legend about the
'Assassinis'; the leaders secured the loyalty of their followers
by intoxicating them with hashish so that they experienced the
joys of paradise as described in the Koran. Translated back into
the every-day world they awaited with the greatest impatience
the death which would take them once more to the bliss which
they had had a foretaste. [Sons
of the Serpent Tribe]
Formally known as the Shiah Ismai, this infamous sect claimed to
hold secret truths, and it can be noted, by the careful researcher,
there may have been Gnostic tendencies among the so-called
Assassini, who very well may have been vilified after the fact, as
is so often the case with any group that seeks to propagate
knowledge. The general view of the Assassini today is that it was a
terrorist organization that sought to impose its will upon the
Islamic World by systematically assassinating political figures that
opposed its ends. I am still trying to find the evidence for these
claims, but so far, it is all hearsay and the only thing we know for
sure is that the Assissini were crushed by the Mongols in 1250. It
is said that the Assassini shook the Moslem world to it's
foundations, but we wonder if that might not have been for a
different reason, perhaps the same reason that the Cathars were, at
the same time, shaking the foundations of the Catholic world?
In
any event, according to the legends, Hasan created a virtual
paradise in a valley beneath his mountain citadel to recruit and
train initiates. That sounds a lot like the great underground
enclave that Osama bin Laden was said to have created in Tora Bora
which later proved to be only a series of primitive caves, little
more than horizontal fox holes.
Hasan
is said to have dispatched his followers to the public houses of the
area, where they would drug and kidnap young men, and transport them
to the valley. There they would awaken from their stupor to find
themselves in luxurious surroundings, tended to by scores of
beautiful young women. Having been informed by the maidens that they
had been transported to Paradise by angels, the hapless victims
would spend their days gorging upon wine, sex and mind-altering
drugs. Then they would mysteriously re-awaken in their former
surroundings, alone and bereft. Months might pass without incident
as they resumed their ordinary and miserable lives; but then
suddenly and mysteriously, they would reawaken in what they
credulously believed to be the Muslim Heaven. After three or four
such experiences, most became willing slaves to Hasan and his
murderous schemes. Persuaded that Hasan was Allah made manifest upon
the Earth, they killed their assigned targets without pity or
remorse; and then went willingly to their deaths, certain of their
place in Paradise.
That
sounds a bit like what is happening nowadays in the U.S. among the
so-called "abductee" and "contactee" populations.
Returning to our timeline, it seems that the methods of terrorism
attributed to the Assassini were actually being practiced by the
Catholic Church in it's crusade against the Cathars.
After years of brutal massacres, of destruction of the land, of
some of the most horrible events ever to bear witness of man’s
inhumanity to man, Pope Gregory IX decided that it was only
results that counted. He intended to wipe Catharism from the
face of the earth. He must have sat up at night to create the
bizarre system that was put into place to deal with heresy.
First, he created special papal legates who were granted wide
powers of prosecution similar to what we have today in the
Homeland Security nonsense, and sent them out all over Europe.
The men chosen for this task were clearly psychopaths, and their
mission was to spread terror all over Europe.
Gregory staffed the episcopal palaces of the South of France
with psychopathic bishops who offered a cash bounty to anyone
who betrayed a heretic. The inducements to betray one's neighbor
were surely tempting in the best of times. But in a time when
starvation and destruction was everywhere after more than 20
years of the rampaging of the Crusading armies, it was well-nigh
impossible to resist. The terms were that the property
confiscated from the heretic was divided between the informer,
the church and the crown. Naturally, in a land that was
financially devastated, where people were displaced and starving
after years of being battered by this same church and crown,
there were a lot of individuals offering up their neighbors for
blood money.
Robert le Bourgre, which means "the bugger", suggesting the
contempt in which he was held by the people, terrorized
formerly peaceful northern France. Another legate, Conrad of
Marburg found unsuspected heretics everywhere in the Rhineland.
Thousands were sent to the stake, often on the same day that
they were accused. Again, sure sounds like Bush and his private
torture chamber at Guantánamo. Conrad rode about on his mule
with two assistants, bringing terror to every village and town
they approached. Apparently, even the regular clergy saw through
this nonsense and finally decided to do something about it. On
July 30, 1233, a Franciscan friar, driven to act in the name of
justice, intercepted Conrad and murdered him.
The pope had had enough. He turned to the Dominicans. In the
spring of 1233, papal inquisitors were appointed in Toulouse,
Albi, and Carcassonne. These inquisitors were succeeded in an
unbroken line for 600 years.
Hundreds of people were summoned to testify before inquisitors.
The questions were repetitive, designed to plant doubt in the
mind of the person being interrogated as to what, exactly, the
inquisitor knew, and who had told him. Hmmm... Sounds like
"Total Information Awareness," doesn't it?
A
person suspected of Cathar sympathies was not always informed of
the charges hanging over his head; if apprised of the danger, he
had no right to know who his accusers were; and if he dared to
seek legal help, his lawyer could be charged with abetting
heresy.
Sounding more and more like George and his War on Terrorism ....
Whatever the verdict of the inquisitor - who was prosecutor,
judge and jury - no appeal was allowed. Anyone could be held
indefinitely in prison for further questioning without cause of
explanation.
Yes. Enemy Combatants, no doubt.
The inquisition destroyed the bonds of trust that hold societies
together. Informing on one’s neighbor became not only a duty,
but a necessary survival strategy. And so it is becoming in
America today.
For 100 years, the inquisition was a fact on the ground of life
in the Languedoc. The arrival of an inquisitor in a town was the
occasion for demeaning displays of moral collapse just as the
arrival of George W. Bush is the occasion for legislators and
journalists to take off their shirts and display the wide yellow
streaks down their backs.
In theory, of course, no one could be punished if no one talked
because the inquisitor could not act without a writ of
denunciation, but in practice, no community possessed the
cohesion needed to combat the power of a secret tribunal.
The same is true in America today. Everyone has been adequately
conditioned by watching "reality TV" and "Survivor," and they
know the rules: Do unto others before they do unto you. And so
it was in the Languedoc, the historical model for what is
happening in the United States today, and for what happened in
Germany under Hitler.
Upon his arrival in a town, the inquisitor consulted with the
local clergy. All males over the age of 14, and females over the
age of 12, were required to make a profession of faith in the
Catholic church. Those who didn’t were the first to be
questioned. Then, the inquisitor would give a speech in which he
invited the people to spend some days thinking very, very hard
about their activities past, present and future, and to come
forward in the following week to give confidential depositions.
After a seven day grace period, those who had not denounced
themselves would be issued a summons. The punishments ranged
from loss of property , to loss of life. Aside from the capital
crime of being a Cathar, punishable offenses included sheltering
a Cathar, or even failing to report any instance of heresy. The
real proof of genuine piety toward the Catholic Church was
defined as the number of people the sinner was willing to
betray!
It only took ten years for the Inquisition - the work of a few
psychopathic fanatics - to become the proficient bureaucracy
that lasted for 600 years. It employed hundreds of individuals
who interrogated thousands of people with such monotonous
regularity that a regular "glossary" was established for the
"workers".
Armed with a list of proposed offenses to be considered
"heretical" or "supporting heretics," which included just
knowing that a heretic had crossed one's property and failing to
report it, the Inquisition proceeded to intimidate the
population of Europe on a scale that was impossible to imagine.
The sheer numbers of people called to testify, and re-called to
testify again and again, was staggering. In a strange twist of
historical irony, the Cathars - who believed that the material
world was evil and irrelevant - inspired the codification of the
Police State.
A
cross-referenced compendium of the confessions extracted from
tens of thousands of people was compiled, creating a map of the
mental landscape of the Languedoc. The more than 5 thousand
transcripts of interrogations that survive represent only a
small fraction of the work of the Inquisition.
Inquisitors manuals were created to serve as guides for the
growing number of Papal courts in Europe. These manuals reminded
the inquisitors that they were in the business of saving souls,
but I think that the distinction was lost on those whose lives
were lost or ruined by the judgments of the Inquisition.
Languedoc was, essentially, the laboratory for repression.
The reputation of the Inquisition was enhanced by the talented
Inquisitor of Toulouse, Bernard Gui, who was the villain in
Umberto Eco's "The Name of the Rose." The Inquisitors persuaded
a handful of captured Cathars to convert and sell their
testimony. Sicard of Lunel of Albi gave the friars an exhaustive
list of Cathar sympathizers, even fingering his own parents!
Anyone who had ever helped him in his life as a Cathar, whether
they had just given him a bed for the night, a bit of food, or
even a jar of honey, were hauled in to be punished - just on his
word. He and several others like him were lodged thereafter in a
castle outside of Toulouse in the medieval version of the
"witness protection program." Sicard was well paid for his
perfidy and lived to a ripe old age. One wonders how peaceful it
was.
The use of torture was delicately referred to as "putting the
question." In the Languedoc, successive waves of highly trained
inquisitors, aided by informers and torturers, fired by the
totalitarian creed of the Catholic church, with detailed manuals
and expanding registers of "intelligence," slowly but surely
ground Catharism into oblivion.
Thousands of dramas of conscience ended in the dungeons or in
fires quenched with blood. By the end of the century, only the
truly heroic dared to say that this world was evil... It was not
a legal system; it was a system designed to create fear. And so
is the War on Terror in America today. [George
Bush's Inquisition]
The
Inquisition brought the French Monarchy and the Catholic Church into
positions of absolute power. But, paradoxically, the brutal way in
which the genocide of the Cathars was carried out carried the seeds
of the destruction of both the Church's power, and the power of the
Monarchy. Both were so secretly and thoroughly hated and distrusted
by a great many people, that the Protestant Reformation and the
French Revolution grew and festered in the hearts of the masses.
"Apres moi, le deluge..." and a deluge of blood it was, only it was
not controllable. The Elite who wish to rule the world are good
students. They noticed that brutalizing people or leaving them to
starve tends to make the masses a bit cranky.
With
the above mentioned development of Structuralism, "many scientists -
and the members of the ruling class that employed them - believed
that they were justified in treating human beings as if they were
pieces of meat, and as an overall plan of action, proceeded to do
so." These ideas were taken up by the Nazis in their great
experiment in trying to take over the world. After observing Nazi
Germany, it seems that the Soviet Union, Great Britain, and the
United States mounted their own large-scale research programs
designed to develop techniques for psychological control of the
masses. It has been suggested that the U.S. was a latecomer to this
activity, but our
Timeline suggests that this is, in fact, not true.
Convinced that German scientists could help America's postwar
efforts, President Harry Truman agreed in September 1946 to
authorize "Project Paperclip," a program to bring selected German
scientists to work on America's behalf during the "Cold War".
However, Truman expressly excluded anyone found "to have been a
member of the Nazi party and more than a nominal participant in its
activities, or an active supporter of Nazism or militarism."
The
War Department's Joint Intelligence Objectives Agency (J.I.O.A.)
conducted background investigations of the scientists. In February
1947, J.I.O.A. Director Bosquet Wev submitted the first set of
scientists' dossiers to the State and Justice Departments for
review. The Dossiers were damning. Samuel Klaus, the State
Departments representative on the J.I.O.A. board, claimed that all
the scientists in this first batch were "ardent Nazis." Their visa
requests were denied.
A
memo was written saying that "the best interests of the United
States have been subjugated to the efforts expended in 'beating a
dead Nazi horse.'" Nazi Intelligence leader Reinhard Gehlen met with
the C.I.A. director Allen Dulles. Gehlen was a master spy for the
Nazis and had infiltrated Russia with his vast Nazi Intelligence
network. Dulles promised Gehlen that his Intelligence unit was safe
in the C.I.A.. Dulles had the scientists dossier's re-written to
eliminate incriminating evidence. And so, Allen Dulles delivered the
Nazi Intelligence unit to the C.I.A., which later opened many
umbrella projects stemming from Nazi research. (MK-ULTRA /
ARTICHOKE, OPERATION MIDNIGHT CLIMAX).
By
1955, more than 760 German scientists had been granted citizenship
in the U.S. and given prominent positions in the American scientific
community. Many had been longtime members of the Nazi party and the
Gestapo, had conducted experiments on humans at concentration camps,
had used slave labor, and had committed other war crimes. In a 1985
expose in the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists Linda Hunt wrote
that she had examined more than 130 reports on Project Paperclip
subjects--and every one "had been changed to eliminate the security
threat classification."
President Truman, who had explicitly ordered no committed Nazis to
be admitted under Project Paperclip, was evidently never aware that
his directive had been violated.
So it
was that the Office of Strategic Services - forerunner to the
Central Intelligence Agency - enlisted the Nazi Scientists for
"specialized problem solving." Foremost among these was solving the
problem of agent recruitment. That is to say, getting agents that
were not only not on the payroll, but who were literally impervious
to being "broken." A second problem they wanted to solve immediately
was gathering intelligence from the agents of other governments who,
they already suspected, had been made "impervious" to detection, as
well as making sure their own recruits had not been compromised.
That is to say, they wanted a "truth serum." Senior O.S.S. officers
turned to the behaviourists for a scientific solutions.
The
story we are told about this goes as follows:
"Despite frantic efforts, the O.S.S. failed to find an effective
interrogative drug. Yet the lure was so enormous that even after
the war the newly created C.I.A. continued the effort
undeterred. But it was not until the 1949 trial of Cardinal
Josef Mindszentry by the Soviet-installed Hungarian communist
regime that the C.I.A. realized that drugs held other promises
as well. In the course of Mindszentry's trial, his deportment,
demeanor and speech led C.I.A. analysts to the conclusion that
he had been successfully subjected to an extraordinary form of
psychological manipulation. Although the technique was unknown
to C.I.A. psychologists, it was clearly of such efficacy and
power as to cause him to confess to crimes he did not commit and
could not have committed; and they were quite certain that drugs
were somehow involved. The Soviets had clearly mastered a new
form of totalitarian control; and discovering its secrets became
an urgent intelligence priority. On April 20, 1950, C.I.A.
Director Roscoe Hillenkoetter approved the United States'
government's first research and development program expressly
designed to develop techniques for the control of the human
mind. It was known through successive incarnations as Projects
BLUEBIRD, ARTICHOKE, MKULTRA and MKSEARCH; and eventually came
to encompass 149 distinct behavioral science research programs
and 33 related non-behavioral projects over the course of
twenty-three years.
The open-ended research program that Hillenkoetter approved was
given sudden impetus by two dramatic developments. The first was
the outbreak of war in Korea sixty-six days later; the second
was the public breakdown of the U. S. ambassador to the Soviet
Union some two years thereafter. During the Korean conflict
American forces often performed poorly in the field against
enemy armies that had no prior experience in mechanized warfare;
and in one particularly shameful incident, an entire U.S. army
division fled the field.
Moreover, the conduct of American servicemen in captivity was
shocking. Fifteen per cent of American prisoners of war held by
the Chinese Communists actively collaborated with their captors,
and a full seventy per cent signed fraudulent confessions to war
crimes or written denunciations of the United States government.
More alarming still, large numbers of those that signed
confessions or denunciations refused to recant after their
repatriation. Many were suspected of having returned to the
United States as willing spies for the enemy; and some were
later proven to be. Of similar concern was the bizarre behavior
of Ambassador George F. Kennan at Templehof airport while en
route to London from Moscow. There Kennan exploded in anger at a
naïve question posed by an inexperienced reporter; and as a
result of his ill-advised response was declared persona non
grata by the Soviet regime. Such were the times that many senior
American officials were convinced that this incident provided
strong evidence that Kennan had fallen victim to Soviet mind
control.
The general outline of the C.I.A.'s behavioral science research
program - commonly, but incorrectly referred to as MKULTRA - was
inadvertently revealed by the Rockefeller Commission in 1975.
Established by President Ford to investigate allegations of
C.I.A. illegality, the Commission's Final Report contained a
one-line reference to a federal employee who had killed himself
after having been unwittingly drugged by a C.I.A. officer as
part of an MKULTRA experiment. This sparked a press furor that
eventually resulted in more extensive congressional
investigations chaired by Sen. Edward F. Kennedy. Not
surprisingly, both the press and the Sen. Kennedy focused their
investigations upon the more lurid aspects of MKULTRA, which
included the kidnapping, drugging and torturing of American
citizens on American soil for research purposes and the effort
to develop "programmed assassins." Overlooked in the process
were the C.I.A.'s efforts to determine the effects of
electromagnetism upon the psyche, electromechanical stimulation
of the brain, a form of technologically-based E.S.P., remote
viewing, precognition, psychokinesis and, especially, nonaural
voice communications with radio and microwave transmissions.
This was unfortunate, for their researchers made gains in most
of these areas and scored dramatic breakthroughs in others.
According to declassified financial records and the testimony of
retired C.I.A. officers, the C.I.A. had by 1961 developed
implant devices for dogs, making it possible for their handlers
to guide them through various courses by remote control. During
this same time frame they also developed techniques for
disrupting bodily functions with radio waves. By the mid-1960's
they had successfully developed and field-tested nonaural voice
communications with both radio and micro waves; and by 1977 they
had developed and field-tested a rudimentary form of
electromechanical "mind reading." But despite overwhelming
evidence to the contrary, they have steadfastly maintained that
they failed entirely in their quest to control the human mind.
There are perhaps three reasons for the C.I.A.'s implausible
denials. The first is legal responsibility. For as the Kennedy
hearings established, C.I.A. officers wildly exceeded their
authority in the course of MKULTRA. Innocent citizens were
kidnapped off the streets and drugged, hypnotized and subjected
to physical torture. These actions were and remain felonious; and
had the criminal justice system taken its proper course, scores
of C.I.A. officers would have faced capital charges. The second
reason is the explosive nature of the data they developed in the
course of their experiments. For contrary to common belief, the
human psyche lacks systemic integrity. Rather than the tightly
integrated system that has been historically assumed, it is in
fact a loosely related collage of drives, inhibitions,
orientations, functions, desires and beliefs - all of which are
subject to external manipulation. The third and final reason is
the extraordinary ease of reengineering the human mind. With the
ARTICHOKE technique, a psyche may be broken apart, restructured
and reassembled almost to specification in approximately four
hours - all without the victim's consent, or even his conscious
awareness.
As declassified C.I.A. documents make clear, a principal
objective of MKULTRA was to develop techniques that would allow
the Agency to exert control over an individual to such an extent
that he would do their bidding "against his will and even
against such fundamental laws of nature such as
self-preservation." Technically, they failed; but only because a
parallel project run by the Department of Defense achieved
success first. The C.I.A. research and development program was
reportedly shut down in 1973, and the ARTICHOKE techniques
perfected by the military were adopted wholesale." [MKULTRA
and the weaponization of the human psyche by Charles S.
Viar]
Now,
the question is: have the C.I.A. or the U.S. military - and their
chief ally, Israel, operationalized ARTICHOKE?
On 6
April 1994, a 19-year-old Palestinian driving a stolen vehicle
packed with explosives pulled up to a crowded bus stop in the
northern Israeli town of Afula. Before the vehicle could come to a
complete stop, it exploded with enormous force, killing the driver
and eight Israelis and wounding 50 more. Although few Western
analysts have made the connection, the Afula attack was a turning
point in the Middle East conflict. For it was the first time that
so-called Islamic terrorists - clearly victims of operation
ARTICHOKE - were used to mount suicide attacks as False Flag
operations. Since then, it is clear that project ARTICHOKE - or its
successor - has been behind almost a hundred additional suicide
attacks against Israel, and the United States, and now, Great
Britain.
The
results have been devastating to Arabs, Islamics, the Palestinians,
and VERY good for the business of Israel and the United States. In
Israel, suicide bombers have killed approximately 1000 Israelis and
wounded almost five times as many. However, for each Israeli killed
by suicide bombers, Israel has been able to kill three Palestinians
and to further effect its plan of genocide of the Palestinian
people.
Furthermore, the results of the so-called suicide bomber attacks
have served only to make Arabs and Muslims targets of xenophobia
around the globe.
In
recent times, Israel has pointed to the economic damages it has
suffered as "proof" that Israel is NOT running "false flag," or
"ARTICHOKE" operations. They cite the facts that, in Israel,
economic growth has ground to a standstill and that Israel is now
suffering a net population loss from emigration, as young Israelis
leave for Europe and America in search of employment and, perhaps,
security. You can bet that there will be a new wave of
"anti-Semitism" launched in order to drive the Jews back to Israel.
The
9-11 attacks against New York and Washington are prime examples of
ARTICHOKE technologies. We are constantly reminded that "19 Arab
terrorists dunnit," and the mainstream press has failed to
adequately address the issue that many of the “hijackers” named by
the F.B.I. are alive and well. Saudi Arabia's Foreign Minister
Prince Saud Al-Faisal told the Arabic Press after meeting with
President George W. Bush on Sept. 20: "It was proved that five of
the names included in the F.B.I. list had nothing to do with what
happened."
But
certainly, SOMEBODY did.
"As of this writing, there has been no public discussion of
ARTICHOKE-assisted suicide bombings. Indeed, all official
discussions of suicide attacks have carefully omitted any
reference to ARTICHOKE as an element of the suicide attack
strategy. They have instead focused upon the supposed religious
fanaticism of the bombers. [...]
[R]eligious fanaticism fails to explain the remarkably low
failure rate of suicide bombings. To date, not a single recruit
is known to have defected to either Israel or the United States;
and only one is known to have refused to carry out his assigned
mission. On the basis of current public source reports, the
failure rate of suicide bombers appears to be about 1 in 80; and
such an extraordinary figure is only attributable to scientific
technique." [...] [MKULTRA and the weaponization of the human
psyche by Charles S. Viar]
The
modern intell view of the problem of suicide bombers goes as
follows:
"For more than a century and a half, Hasan bin Sabah and his
followers terrorized the Muslim world by systematically
murdering anyone who stood in their way. In this, their
principal weapon was the programmed assassin, psychologically
weaponized with a technique strikingly similar to ARTICHOKE. In
terms of strategy, tactics and technique, the Assassini were the
historical predecessors of today's suicide bombers; and for that
reason they are instructive. The Medieval Islamic elite failed
to devise an effective strategy against suicide assassins, and
for that they paid a fearsome price.
It was not until the Mongol Conquest that the Assassini were
finally suppressed, and then only by sheer brutality. Lacking
modern sensibilities, the Mongols laid waste their strongholds
and surrounding areas; and all known, suspected, and potential
supporters of the Assassini were summarily put to the sword. The
number of people killed by the Mongol's in their campaign
against the Assassini has been lost to history, but it was
surely in the hundreds of thousands and it may have numbered in
the millions.
Contemporary suicide bombers pose an almost identical challenge
to the political structures of the contemporary world." [...] [MKULTRA
and the weaponization of the human psyche by Charles S.
Viar]
Re-read the last two paragraphs above: We see in this the
justification for nuclear war being brought forward, a war that can
"lay waste" the lands of the Muslims, as well as "all known,
suspected, and potential supporters..."
Remember: those who are at the top of the heap
will always take whatever steps are necessary to maintain the status
quo. It is obvious that they cannot completely control the
propagation of the information. So, how do they "keep secrets?" They
don't. Everything is right out there in the public domain. Anybody
who wants to can do the research we have done and come to the
realizations we have in this process. BUT, not everyone is able to
withstand the OTHER weapon of Mass Control: the fear of being
labeled a "suspected or potential supporter" in a world where the
Grand Inquisitor has total control over life and death.
Here
is where we come back to the context. If we take it as an operating
hypothesis that there does exist a powerful elite whose interests
are served by science, who are they?
"The main threat to Democracy comes not from the extreme left
but from the extreme right, which is able to buy huge sections
of the press and radio, and wages a constant campaign to smear
and discredit every progressive and humanitarian measure." -
George Seldes
"There exists a shadowy Government with its own Air Force, its
own Navy, its own fundraising mechanism, and the ability to
pursue its own ideas of national interest, free from all checks
and balances, and free from the law itself." Daniel K. Inouye
U.S. Senator
But
who is behind it all? Ah! that is the question! I don't think we can
just lay it at the doorstep of the "Government." We have to remember
that the government is composed of people just like us. And that is
where it gets scary. If my two clients, (among many), could be
abducted and manipulated to believe what they believed, might it not
be possible that this is happening in the Hallowed Halls of
Statesmanship? Just imagine George Bush and Dick Cheney in the hands
Project ARTICHOKE! Scary, huh?
And so
we find, with this brief review, that those individuals who simply
can't grasp what the governments of the planet are doing - that they
are servicing the agenda of those who want absolute power - simply
don't understand the nature of belief, of hypnosis, of mind control,
of propaganda, of being fooled, and how easy it is for a small core
group to do all of the above.
One
certainly wonders, of course, if all the information about Gitmo and
Abu Ghraib was allowed to come out just to terrify anybody who might
think about speaking out. I can assure you that the fear of being
detained and tortured sure puts a damper on speaking up for the
average person!
People
are becoming more and more frightened by the twists and turns things
are taking. THEY control the media, the money, the resources...
Whenever we make a good manoeuver in the direction of truth, they
bring all that formidable array of disinfo to bear on us: witness
the Washington Post, Popular Mechanics and Scientific American
responses to the hundreds of millions of people sharing the Pentagon
Strike video. Witness the sudden popularization of the Peak Oil
business, even including promotion in major media. And then, as
Downing Street and Rove-gate began to make some waves, the recent
so- called "suicide bombing" attacks. Watching what everyone is
doing does not give me much hope because we see again and again that
the control of the media is the biggest barrier and we know who
controls THAT. Already, we can see that the direction things are
moving is going to lead to total suppression of even our few voices
- perhaps even elimination of US!
The day
may come, and rather soon it seems, when our voice will be silenced,
other voices will be silenced, and then who will speak for the
TRUTH?
The
greatest fear of the "Powers That Be" is a global cry for justice.
The owners
and publishers of these pages wish to state that the material
presented here is the product of our research and experimentation in
Superluminal Communication. We invite the reader to share in our
seeking of Truth by reading with an Open, but skeptical mind. We do
not encourage "devotee-ism" nor "True Belief." We DO encourage the
seeking of Knowledge and Awareness in all fields of endeavor as the
best way to be able to discern lies from truth. The one thing we can
tell the reader is this: we work very hard, many hours a day, and
have done so for many years, to discover the "bottom line" of our
existence on Earth. It is our vocation, our quest, our job. We
constantly seek to validate and/or refine what we understand to be
either possible or probable or both. We do this in the sincere hope
that all of mankind will benefit, if not now, then at some point in
one of our probable futures.
Contact
Webmaster at
cassiopaea.com
Copyright © 1997-2004 Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk.
All rights reserved. "Cassiopaea, Cassiopaean, Cassiopaeans," is a
registered trademark of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk.
Letters addressed to Cassiopaea, Quantum Future School, Ark or
Laura, become the property of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk
Republication and re-dissemination of
the contents of this screen or any portion of this website in any
manner is expressly prohibited without prior written consent.
|
